For this vision of killing in the name of healing was at the heart of Nazi mass murder. More than that, such a malignant vision seems to be part of virtually all expressions of genocide.
BY Robert Jay Lifton
Sept. 21, 1986
Credit…The New York Times Archives See the article in its original context from September 21, 1986, Section 6, Page 64 Buy Reprints New York Times subscribers* enjoy full access to TimesMachine—view over 150 years of New York Times journalism, as it originally appeared. SUBSCRIBE
Before Auschwitz and the other death camps, the Nazis had established a policy of direct medical killing – killing arranged within medical channels, by means of medical decisions, and carried out by doctors and their assistants. The Nazis called this program “euthanasia.“
“Euthanasia,“ in its Greek derivation, means “good death.“ The word is generally used for actions taken to facilitate the deaths of those who are already dying, and has long been a subject of debate for physicians, moral philosophers and the general public.
Just how the Nazis were able to do that has been made clearer by recent historical research and by interviews I was able to conduct during the last decade with German doctors who participated in the killing project.
Nazi medicalized killing provided both the method – the gas chamber – and much of the personnel for the death camps themselves. In Auschwitz, for instance, doctors selected prisoners for death, supervised the killings in the gas chambers and decided when the victims were dead.
Doctors, in short, played a crucial role in the Final Solution. The full significance of medically directed killing for Nazi theory and behavior cannot be comprehended unless we understand how Nazi doctors destroyed the boundary between healing and killing.
The Nazi principle of killing as a therapeutic imperative is evident in the words of the Auschwitz S.S. doctor Fritz Klein. Klein was asked by an inmate how he could reconcile Auschwitz’s smoking chimneys with his purported fealty to the physician’s Hippocratic oath, which requires the preservation of life. “Of course I am a doctor and I want to preserve life,“ replied Klein. “And out of respect for human life, I would remove a gangrenous appendix from a diseased body. The Jew is the gangrenous appendix in the body of mankind.“
THE NAZIS JUSTI-fied direct medical killing by use of the simple concept of “life unworthy of life“ – lebensunwertes Leben. While this concept predated the Nazis, it was carried to its ultimate racial and “therapeutic“ extreme by them.
Of the five identifiable steps by which the Nazis carried out the destruction of “life unworthy of life,“ coercive sterilization was the first. There followed the killing of “impaired“ children in hospitals, and then the killing of “impaired“ adults -mostly collected from mental hospitals – in centers especially equipped with carbon monoxide. The same killing centers were then used for the murders of “impaired“ inmates of concentration camps. The final step was mass killing, mostly of Jews, in the extermination camps themselves.
Once in power – Hitler took the oath of office as Chancellor of the Third Reich on Jan. 30, 1933 – the Nazi regime introduced an early sterilization law with adeclaration that Germany was in grave danger of Volkstod -“death of the people,“ “nation“ or “race“ – and that, to combat it, harsh and sweeping measures were imperative.
Mandatory sterilization of those termed the “hereditarily sick“ was part of the Nazi vision of racial purification. No one knows how many people were sterilized; reliable estimates range from 200,000 to 350,000 people.
The crucial theoretical work was Die Freigabe der Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens, or “The Permission to Destroy Life Unworthy of Life.“ Published in 1920, it was written jointly by two distinguished German professors, the jurist Karl Binding, retired after 40 years at the University of Leipzig, and Alfred Hoche, professor of psychiatry at the University of Freiburg.
Hoche argued in the book that a policy of killing was compassionate and consistent with medical ethics. He pointed to situations where doctors were obliged to destroy life – interrupting a pregnancy to save the mother, for example. He went on to claim that various forms of psychiatric disturbance, brain damage and retardation indicated that the patients were already “mentally dead.“ He characterized these people as “human ballast“ and “empty shells of human beings“ – terms that would later reverberate in Nazi Germany. Putting such people to death, Hoche wrote, “is not to be equated with other types of killing.“ It is, he wrote, “an allowable, useful act.“
Binding and Hoche turned out to be the prophets of direct medicalized killing. Prior to the Nazis‘ assumption of power, such thinking was not a majority view in German psychiatry and medicine. But under the Nazis, there was increasing discussion in medical and political circles of the legitimacy of mercy killing, of Hoche’s concept of the mentally dead, and of the enormous economic drain on German society caused by the large number of impaired Germans. A mathematics textbook of the period even asked students to calculate how many government loans to newly married couples could be granted for the money it cost the state to care for “the crippled, the criminal, and the insane.“
THE KILLING OF children – indeed the entire Nazi “euthanasia“ program – began simply with a petition to allow the “mercy killing“ (Gnadentod, literally “mercy death“) of an infant named Knauer, who was born blind, with one leg and part of one arm missing, and apparently an “idiot.“ The petition was made by the baby’s grandmother (some claim it was the father) but it was clearly encouraged by the regime.
In late 1938 or early 1939, Hitler ordered Karl Brandt, his personal physician and close confidant, to go to the clinic at the University of Leipzig where the child was hospitalized, to consult with the physicians there and to determine whether the information submitted about the child was accurate. If the facts about the child’s condition were correct, Brandt recalled in 1947 at the Nuremberg Medical Trial (one in the series of Nazi war-crimes trials that was devoted solely to the prosecution of medical crimes), then in Hitler’s name “I was to inform the physicians . . . that they could carry out euthanasia.“ Brandt was also empowered to tell the doctors at Leipzig that any legal proceedings against them would be quashed by order of Hitler.
According to Brandt, the doctors agreed “that there was no justification“ for keeping the child alive. In his recollection of the incident at the Nuremberg Medical Trial, he added that “in maternity wards, in some circumstances, it is quite natural for the doctors themselves to perform euthanasia in such a case without anything further being said about ‚
On returning to Berlin, Brandt was authorized by Hitler, who did not want to be publicly identified with the project, to establish a child-killing program with the help of Philip Bouhler, chief of Hitler’s Chancellery.
The child-killing program began with newborns, then proceeded to children up to the ages of 3 and 4 and soon to older ones. The authorization for the killing project was, at first, oral, secret and “kept in a very narrow scope,“ covering “only the most serious cases,“ according to Karl Brandt’s Nuremberg trial testimony. It later became loose, extensive and known among a wider and wider circle of physicians and officials.
It was decided that the program would be run secretly from the Chancellery, although the health division of the Reich Interior Ministry would help to administer it. For that purpose, an organization was created: the Reich Committee for the Scientific Registration of Serious Hereditary and Congenital Diseases. The name was meant to convey the sense of a formidable medical-scientific board, although its leader, Hans Hefelmann, had a degree in agricultural economics.
The impression of medical propriety was maintained in a confidential directive sent on Aug. 18, 1939, by Minister of the Interior Wilhelm F. Frick to the heads of non-Prussian state governments. The directive ordered “the earliest possible registration“ of all children under 3 years of age in whom “serious hereditary diseases“ were “suspected“; included on the list of diseases were idiocy and mongolism (especially when associated with blindness and deafness), microcephaly, hydrocephaly, paralysis, and spastic conditions and malformations of all kinds, but especially of the limbs, head and spinal column. The registration was necessary “for the clarification of scientific questions in the field of congenital malformation and mental retardation.“
Midwives were required to make these reports at the time of a child’s birth, and doctors were to report all impaired children up to the age of 3. District medical officers were responsible for the accuracy of the reports, and the chief physicians of maternity clinics and wards were notified that the reports – which took the form of questionnaires from the Reich Health Ministry – were required.
By June 1940, the questionnaires were expanded to include not only a child’s specific illness or condition, but details about family history – including hereditary illnesses and alcohol, nicotine or drug abuse – as well. The revised reports also required a more detailed evaluation of the child’s condition by a physician, indicating possibilities for improvement, life expectancy, prior institutional observation and treatment, details of physical and mental development, and descriptions of convulsions and related phenomena.
The actual killing was done in children’s institutions whose chiefs and prominent physicians were known to be politically reliable and “positive“ toward the goals of the Reich Committee. These killing centers were grandly referred to as “Reich Committee Institutions,“ “Children’s Specialty Institutions“ or even “Therapeutic Convalescent Institutions.“ Doctors, administrators and Reich officials proceeded as if the children were to receive the blessings of medical science.
No such separate institutions existed, of course. The children marked for death were usually dispersed among ordinary pediatric patients at children’s hospitals.
THE FALSIFICATION was clearly intended to deceive the children, their families and the general public. But, by expressing literally the Nazi reversal of healing and killing, the deceptions also served the psychological needs of the killers. A doctor could tell a parent that “it might be necessary to perform a surgical operation that could possibly have an unfavorable result“; or he might explain that “the ordinary therapy employed until now could no longer help“ their child, necessitating “extraordinary therapeutic measures.“
The structure of the child-killing program also diffused individual responsibility. In the entire sequence – from the reporting of cases by midwives and doctors, to the supervision of the reporting by heads of institutions, to the coordination of the reports by Health Ministry officials, to the child’s appearance at the Reich Committee institution for killing – there was no need for any single participant to feel personally responsible for the murder of another human being. Each participant could feel like no more than a small cog in a vast, officially sanctioned, medical machine.
Before being killed, children were generally kept for a few weeks in the institution, to convey the impression that they were to undergo some form of medical therapy. The killing was usually arranged by the institution’s director or by a doctor working under him. Frequently, the order to kill a child was delivered by innuendo, rather than as a specific directive.
Killing was generally done with tablets of Luminal – a barbiturate – dissolved in tea or another liquid. Luminal would be given to a child repeatedly over two or three days, until the child lapsed into continuous sleep and then died.
For children who had difficulty drinking, Luminal was sometimes injected. If the Luminal did not kill the child quickly enough, the child would be given a morphine-scopolamine injection. An ordinary disease, such as pneumonia, would be listed as the cause of death; there was a kernel of truth within that lie, since the immediate cause of death following an overdose of a drug like Luminal often was pneumonia.
From the start of the program in 1939, the criteria for killing children continually expanded, and came to include various minor handicaps. The program culminated with the killing of youths designated as juvenile delinquents.
Jewish children could be placed in the net simply because they were Jewish. At Heyer, one of the childrens‘ institutions, a special department was established for “minor Jewish-Aryan half-breeds.“
Although Hitler officially ordered the termination of the general “euthanasia“ project in 1941, partly in response to public criticism by some German clergymen, the killing of children continued. Indeed, it probably increased, but was conducted in a more haphazard fashion. Estimates based on various trial materials and other evidence indicate that 5,000 children were killed between 1939 and 1945, but the total was probably much higher.
The Fuhrer decree, a personal directive from Hitler that had the authority of law, was brief; it charged Karl Brandt and Philip Bouhler, chief of the Reich Chancellery, with “responsibility for expanding the authority of physicians, to be designated by name, to the end that patients considered incurable according to the best available human judgment of their state of health can be granted a mercy death.“
Questionnaires for the T4 project were devised by a small group of psychiatrists and administrators. The questionnaires were distributed, with the help of the Health Ministry, not only to psychiatric institutions but to all hospitals and homes for chronic patients. The limited space provided on the questionnaires for biographical and symptomatic information, as well as the cover letter sent with them, gave the impression that the Government was conducting a statistical survey for administrative, and possibly scientific, purposes. But the sinister truth was suggested by the great stress in the questionnaires on the need for a “precise description“ of the patient’s ability to work.
From the start, the T4 reporting process was haphazard. Physicians and administrators were required to return the forms quickly; one institutional doctor had to fill out 1,500 questionnaires in two weeks. Early confusion about the purpose of the forms led some doctors to exaggerate the severity of their patients‘ conditions, in the belief that they were protecting them from a plan to release them from institutions in order to send them to work.
In a thick, black frame at the lower left-hand corner of the forms, each of the “experts“ would write an “x“ in red pencil, meaning death; “-‚‚ in blue pencil, meaning life; or “?“ sometimes accompanied with the comment “worker.“
If anything, the evaluations by the experts were even more mercurial and superficial than those of the doctors and administrators who initially filled out the questionnaires. Each expert was sent at least 100 questionnaires at a time. During one 17-day period, one of the experts was required to complete 2,109 evaluations.
The experts did no examinations and had no access to medical histories; they made decisions solely on the basis of the questionnaires. Their occasional disagreements had only to do with definitions and policy; the pressure was always to order a patient’s death. At his 1946 trial, Friedrich Mennecke, one of the experts, recalled the implicit directive that “one should not be petty . . . but instead, liberal“ in rendering a “positive judgment.“
TRANSPORTATION AR-rangements for patients marked for death were a caricature of the psychiatric transfer process. The organization created for this function, the Common Welfare Ambulance Service Ltd., sent out “transport lists“ to the hospitals from which it was to collect patients. It also issued instructions to the hospitals that patients must be accompanied by their case histories, personal possessions and lists of valuables held for them. In addition, it prohibited the transfer of patients whose lives would be endangered by lengthy transport -a show of medical propriety designed to avoid the awkwardness of a patient dying en route.
S.S. personnel manned the buses, frequently masquerading as doctors, nurses, or medical attendants by wearing white uniforms or white coats. Reports of “men with white coats and S.S. boots“ came to characterize much of the “euthanasia“ project.
To hide patients from the public, bus windows were covered with dark paint, fixed curtains or blinds. The medical staffs of the institutions from which patients were taken, as well as the patients themselves, of course, were not told the destination of the buses.
Six main killing centers were established between January 1940 and January 1941.Typically, the centers were converted mental hospitals or nursing homes, although one had been a prison. All were in isolated areas and had high walls. Some had originally been constructed as castles.
Initially, patients were taken directly to the killing centers. This practice was eventually discontinued, and patients were kept for brief periods at “observation institutions“ or “transit institutions“ – often large state hospitals near the killing centers – before being sent to their deaths. The observation institutions provided an aura of medical legitimacy, an ostensible check against mistakes. In fact, no real examinations or observations were made.
The bureaucratic mystification was furthered by letters sent to the families. First, they were notified of a patient’s transfer from the psychiatric institution or hospital “because of important war-related measures.“ When the patient reached the killing center, the family was sent a second letter, announcing his or her “safe“ arrival; this notice also informed the families of the impossibility of visits or inquiries because of “Reich defense reasons“ and “the shortage of personnel brought about by the war.“ However, family members were told that they would be informed “immediately“ of changes in a patient’s condition or in the visiting policy. The second letter was signed, with a false name, by either the killing doctor or the chief of the killing center.
A third letter, again sent under a false name by the “Condolence Letter Department,“ notified the family of the patient’s death.
That death generally occurred within 24 hours of a patient’s arrival at the killing center. Under T4 policy, a doctor had to perform the actual killing, in accordance with the motto enunciated by Viktor Brack, head of the Chancellery’s Department II, which had responsibility for the T4 program:
“The syringe belongs in the hand of a physician.“
A syringe was the exception; it was usually a matter of opening a gas cock.
THROUGHOUT THE “euthanasia“ project, senior doctors served as consultants and experts, made policy and rendered decisions. Younger doctors did most of the killing.
At Brandenburg, one of the killing centers, for example, Dr. Irmfried Eberl was 29 years old when he learned to operate the gassing mechanism. The man later assigned to assist him, Dr. Aquilin Ullrich, was only 26.
In a 1961 investigation of the T4 program, Ullrich testified that his duties barely required any medical knowledge. He and Eberl (who later became the commandant of Treblinka, the only doctor actually to head a death camp) did no more than make a “superficial inspection“ of the naked patients in the gas chamber’s anteroom. He subsequently realized that “the presence of the physician at that moment was used to calm the mentally ill and camouflage the killing process.‘‚
Every death certificate had to be falsified. Medical credibility was the primary factor in ascribing a false cause of death: The disease had to be consistent with a patient’s prior physical and mental state, a disease that he or she could have contracted.Designated causes of death included infectious diseases, pneumonia and diseases of the heart, lungs, brain and other major organs. Skill at this falsification process was an important part of the “medical experience“ of the killing doctors. To help them, physicians were given written guidelines specifying which details were necessary for consistency.
One such guideline, for example, focused upon septicemia (bacteria in the bloodstream) as a cause of death; it referred to bacterial infection of the skin as a possible source of the disease, and listed the sequence of symptoms and the therapy to be cited. The document included additional useful tips, among them the fact that unclean mental patients often have boils which they scratch, causing the infection. “It is most expedient to figure four days for the basic illness and five days for the resultant sepsis,“ read the guide. The diagnosis, it added, “should not be used with patients who are meticulously clean.“
The bureaucracy of deception extended to the ashes of cremated patients. Families were told that quick cremation had been necessary for public health reasons, particularly during wartime. An additional directive prohibited corpses from being cremated individually. One of the T4 program’s leaders, Gerhard Bohne, testified in his 1959 in Germany that he had objected vehemently, “for reasons of piety,“ when that policy was implemented. He claimed to have told the administrator responsible for the order: “Even if the German people forgive you everything, they will never forgive you this.‘‚
I NEVITABLY, THERE were flaws in the bureaucracy of deception. A family would receive two urns, or be told that a patient, whose appendix had been removed earlier, had died of appendicitis.
Employees of the killing centers would drink heavily at local bars and sometimes reveal elements of their work. Sometimes, patient-transfer procedures were conducted where they could be seen – even on occasion in a town marketplace – allowing local people to witness the force used on recalcitrant victims.
And, of course, there was direct sensory evidence of the killing that no bureaucratic deception could eliminate. “The heavy smoke from the crematory building is said to be visible over Hadamar every day,“ read one 1939 report to the Reich Justice Ministry.
Nazi authorities were aware of these bureaucratic oversights; one local party official requested “more sensitivity“ from T4 officials in conducting the killing program. But the “mistakes“ were partly a product of the regime’s own inner conflicts and contradictions about its principle of secrecy. In spite of the elaborate cover-up that existed at every level and the pledge of eternal secrecy taken by all involved in the killing project, outsiders were allowed to visit several of the killing centers and, on some occasions, permitted to witness the killing of patients.
FROM THE BEGINning of the T4 operation, Jewish patients were viewed as a group apart. Under T4, Jewish inmates of German institutions did not have to meet the ordinary criteria for medical killing. Jewish mental patients were unique among all Nazi victims in that they could embody both “dangerous genes“ in an individual medical sense and “racial poison“ in a collective ethnic sense.
For Jews, “no special consultations or discussions . . . were necessary,“ according to documents prepared by West German authorities for the 1961 trial of the T4 medical director Werner Heyde. “The total extermination of this group of asylum inmates was the logical consequence of the radical solution of the Jewish problem being embarked upon.“
The systematic “treatment“ of German Jews under T4 began in April 1940, with a proclamation from the Reich Interior Ministry that within three weeks all Jewish patients were to be registered. In June, the first gassings of Jews took place: 200 men, women and children were killed in the Brandenburg facility; they had been transported to the killing center in six buses from the Berlin-Buch mental institution. There were more killings in July. On Aug. 30, another directive from the Interior Ministry ordered that Jews were to be segregated in specific institutions. The directive explained that employees and relatives of Aryan patients had complained about being treated and housed with Jews.
In the fall of 1940, the Nazis began to transport Jewish patients to occupied Poland, as part of the policy of removing all Jews from Germany. In December, it was announced that Jewish patients would be transferred to a privately owned Jewish institution for mentally impaired children in Bendorf, in the Rhineland.
From Bendorf, Jewish patients were sent either to T4 killing centers or, beginning in the spring of 1942, into channels leading to the death camps. In the latter case, they were transported to Poland, in trains with 60 to 70 patients sealed in each freight car; the trains carried ordinary Jewish citizens as well.
The trains arrived in Lublin, where Polish Jews were being “concentrated,“ and where property confiscated from Jews was processed with slave labor.
The T4 office set up a camouflage operation specifically for Jewish patients. On stationery with letterheads reading “Cholm Insane Asylum,“ statements of condolence and death certificates were sent out. Couriers took the mail to Chelm (the Polish spelling) near Lublin, where the letters were mailed with the proper postmark. As far as can be determined, the “Cholm Insane Asylum“ was a fiction.
When Germany invaded Russia in June 1941, Einsatzgruppen troops under Reinhardt Heydrich liquidated hospital patients as well as Jews, gypsies and Communist functionaries. Reports from the field mentioned the need for beds for injured soldiers.
Psychological trauma suffered by Einsatzgruppen troops led Nazi authorities to lessen their reliance on shooting as a killing method. Explosives were tried – for example, in Russia, in September 1941, when mental patients were blown up. But this method was ineffective, and required too much cleaning up.
In October 1941, Viktor Brack, head of the Chancellery’s Department II, and Adolf Eichmann, the Reich’s expert on Jewish affairs, decided to use the vans for killing all Jews “incapable of working.“ Three vans were installed at the first pure extermination camp established by the Germans at Chelmno (Kulmhof), in what is now north-central Poland, which was opened in December 1941. The vans were used to kill gypsies, typhus victims, Soviet prisoners of war and mental patients, but mainly Jews.
In a replica of the T4 procedure, victims were told to shower while their clothing was being disinfected. S.S. officers wore white coats and carried stethoscopes. Prisoners had their valuables registered, then followed a sign reading “To the Bath“ up a ramp and into the van. When no more noise was audible from the van, it was driven to the nearby woods where Jewish Kommandos unloaded the corpses into mass graves. Because of noxious gases, a crematorium was later installed.
The “euthanasia“ program prefigured the death camps not only in method and personnel but in reversing healing and killing in the name of biological purification.
WHILE IT HAS BEEN estimated that 350 German doctors were involved in specific criminal acts, that figure may be, as one early observer recalled, no more than the “tip of the iceberg.“ A few doctors, in various ways, resisted the Nazi projects, but German physicians as a profession offered themselves to the regime.
During the course of my research, I gained the impression that, among Germans as well as among survivors and scholars throughout the world, this involvement of physicians in killing was viewed as the most shameful of all Nazi behavior. No wonder that it still haunts German medicine, and has only recently begun to be confronted by contemporary German physicians.
Yet it must be confronted, and not only by physicians.
Nazi “euthanasia,“ in fact, provides a key to an understanding of genocide as inclusive murder of the victim group in order to “cure“ one’s own. Since the disease one seeks to eliminate is ultimately death itself, the curative process can be endless. That murderous cure must be combated, interrupted, prevented everywhere.
Robert Jay Lifton is Distinguished Professor of Psychiatry and Psychology at John Jay College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. This article is an adaption from his book, “The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide,“ to be published next month by Basic Books.
A version of this article appears in print on Sept. 21, 1986, Section 6, Page 64 of the National edition with the headline: GERMAN DOCTORS AND THE FINAL SOLUTION. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe
Luminol (C8H7N3O2) is a chemical that exhibits chemiluminescence, with a blue glow, when mixed with an appropriate oxidizing agent. Luminol is a white-to-pale-yellow crystalline solid that is soluble in most polar organic solvents, but insoluble in water.Luminol[1]
When luminol is sprayed evenly across an area, trace amounts of an activating oxidant make the luminol emit a blue glow that can be seen in a darkened room. The glow only lasts about 30 seconds, but can be documented photographically. The glow is stronger in areas receiving more spray; the intensity of the glow does not indicate the amount of blood or other activator present.
Note: Gill states that luminol was prepared as early as 1853. See: Steven K. Gill (1983) „New developments in chemiluminescence research,“ Aldrichimica Acta16 (3) : 59–61; has footnote 2 on p. 60. Available at: Aldrichimica ActaArchived 2015-01-08 at the Wayback Machine. However, the sources Gill cites don’t mention the preparation of luminol before 1902. Gill probably confused luminol with lophine (2,4,5-triphenyl-1H -imidazole), which the sources he cites do mention. Lophine is also chemiluminescent, and was first prepared in 1844 by Auguste Laurent. (See: Auguste Laurent (1844) „Sur un nouvel alcali organique, la lophine“ (On a new organic alkali, lophine), Revue scientifique et industrielle, 18: 272–278.) The chemiluminescence of lophine was first observed by: Radziszewski, Bronisław L. (1877) „Untersuchungen über Hydrobenzamid, Amarin und Lophin“Archived2015-12-14 at the Wayback Machine (Investigations of hydrobenzamide, amarine, and lophine), Berichte der Deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft zu Berlin, 10 : 70–75. In 1853, Ludwig Teichmann developed a test for blood, but it did not rely on chemiluminescence. See: L Teichmann (1853) „Ueber die Krystallisation der organischen Bestandtheile des Bluts“ (On the crystallization of the organic components of blood), Zeitschrift für rationelle Medicin, new series, 3 : 375–388.
[6] See also: Ernest H. Huntress, Lester N. Stanley, and Almon S. Parker (March 1934) „The oxidation of 3-aminophthalhydrazide („luminol“) as a lecture demonstration of chemiluminescence,“ Journal of Chemical Education, 11 (3) : 142–145. doi:10.1021/ed011p142
An evaluation of luminol formulations and their effect on DNA profiling
To exhibit its luminescence, the luminol must be activated with an oxidant. Usually, a solution containing hydrogen peroxide(H2O2) and hydroxide ions in water is the activator. In the presence of a catalyst such as an iron or periodate compound, the hydrogen peroxide decomposes to form oxygen and water:2 H2O2 → O2 + 2 H2OH2O2+ KIO4 → KIO3 + O2 + H2O
Laboratory settings often use potassium ferricyanide or potassium periodate for the catalyst. In the forensic detection of blood, the catalyst is the iron present in hemoglobin.[7]Enzymes in a variety of biological systems may also catalyse the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide.
The exact mechanism of luminol chemiluminescence is a complex multi-step reaction, especially in aqueous conditions. A recent theoretical investigation has been able to elucidate the reaction cascade as shown below.[8]Luminol is first deprotonated in basic conditions, then oxidized to the anionic radical. Which in turn has two paths available to give the key intermediate α-hydroxy- peroxide. After cyclization to the endoperoxide, the mono-anion will undergo decomposition without luminescence, if the pH is too low (< 8.2) for a second deprotonation. The endoperoxide dianion, however can give the retro-Diels-Alder product: 1,2-dioxane-3,6-dione dianion. And after chemiexcitation by two single-electron-transfers (SET) gives 3-aminophthalate dianion in its first singlet excited-state (S1). This highly instable molecule relaxes to the ground state, thereby emitting light of around 425 nm wavelength (purple-blue), the so-called chemiluminescence.
Chemoluminescence mechanism of luminol (cyclic hydrazide) in basic, aqueous solution.[8]
What are Quantum Dots?
Why Did MIT Develop Quantum Dots Capable of Storing Your Medical And Financial Information Under Your Skin? READ – https://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218
Harvard’s (now convicted) Charles M. Lieber Create a U.S. Patent for Using 5G Radiation to Vibrate Corona Virus Particles from Present Nanotube Containers? READ - https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2015199784A2/en
Why Did Harvard’s Charles Lieber Create Patents for Syringe-Injectable Mesh Electronics Integrate Seamlessly with Minimal Chronic Immune Response in the Brain? READ - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28533392/
PATENT: WO-2015-199784A2 – Systems and Methods for Injectable Devices – Why Did Harvard’s (now convicted) Charles M. Lieber Create a U.S. Patent for Using 5G Radiation to Vibrate Corona Virus Particles from Preset Nanotubule Containers? https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2015199784A2/en
PATENT – US-2012-0228565 A1 – READ – Method for Preparing Surface-Modified Semiconducting And Metallic Nanoparticles Having Enhanced Dispersibility In Aqueous Media – https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/e6/9d/c3/787a071bfff162/US20120228565A1.pdf
PATENT – US-2010-0216804 A1 – READ – Long Circulating Nanoparticles for Sustained Release of Therapeutic Agents https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/25/ce/6d/84cb16adb713b2/US20100216804A1.pdf
PATENT – US-2012/0265001A1 – READ – Composite Magnetic Nanoparticle Drug Delivery System https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/d1/d5/03/2cb5028a1e528c/US20120265001A1.pdf
PATENT – US-2013-0251618 A1 – READ – Method for Making Semiconducting Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/9e/bc/82/52d2a8e8c97ac2/US20130251618A1.pdf
PATENT: US-2012-0250948A1 – READ – System and Method for Biometric Identification using Ultraviolet (UV) Image Data https://patents.google.com/patent/US20120250948A1/en
Why Did MIT Develop Central Bank Digital Currencies Designed to Work with www.Quant.Network Technology? https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/central-banks-and-digital-currency/overview/
Why Does the WO2020060606 CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA Exist?
Why Did China Choose to Pay the Renowned Nanotechnology Researcher & Harvard University Professor (Charles Lieber) $50,000 Per Month to Gain Access to His Patents for Using 5G Radiation to Vibrate Corona Virus Particles from Preset Nanotubule Containers? (Nanotechnology Can Be Weaponized to Deliver Viruses) -
Answer: Equilibration is a method of normalizing the sensor and system so that the output of every sensing element is the same when a uniform pressure is applied. The software then determines a unique scale factor for that sensing element to compensate for the slight variation.
April 14th 2016 - Why Did Rice University Develop Self-Assembling Graphene Oxide Using Nano-Technology?
Watch the Original Video Posted by Rice University:
Carbon nanotubes in a dish assemble themselves into a nanowire in seconds under the influence of a custom-built Tesla coil created by scientists at Rice University.
But the scientists don't limit their aspirations for the phenomenon they call Teslaphoresis to simple nanowires.
The team led by Rice research scientist Paul Cherukuri sees its invention as setting a path toward the assembly of matter from the bottom up on nano and macro scales.
The COVID-19 vaccination programs must be stopped immediately
The German Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis has made its initial findings publicly available in a wide-ranging report:
Toxic substances were found in all of the samples of COVID-19 vaccines – without exception.
The blood samples of all the people who had been vaccinated showed marked changes.
The greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent are vaccine side effects.
In all samples of COVID-19 vaccines, without exception, components were found, using several methods of measurement, that: – are, in the quantities found, toxic according to medical guidelines, – had not been declared by the manufacturers as present in the vaccines, – are for the most part metallic, – are visible under the dark-field microscope as distinctive and complex structures of different sizes, – can only partially be explained as a result of crystallization or decomposition processes, – cannot be explained as contamination from the manufacturing process.
The comparison of blood samples from unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals by means of dark-field microscopy showed noticeable changes in the blood of each person who had been vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccines. This was evident even if those people hadn’t at that point displayed any visible reaction to the vaccinations. Complex structures similar to those in the vaccines were found in the blood samples of the vaccinated. Using artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis, the difference between the blood of vaccinated and unvaccinated people was confirmed.
The stability of the lipid nanoparticle envelope is closely correlated with the incidence of vaccine side effects and injury. The more stable this envelope, the greater the amount of mRNA that penetrates cells, where the production of spike proteins then takes place. These results correspond with the findings of pathologists who have carried out autopsies on people who died due to vaccine injury. Spike proteins were detected in damaged tissue. Researchers suspect that the spike protein is, in itself, is toxic.
Please look at this extensive research and excellent documentation here:
Dr. Daniel Nagase discusses in this video the mass spectroscopy that did not identify any Phosphorous or Nitrogen in the sample. This means there was no elements related to life, that constitute molecules like RNA, DNA or proteins.
In this video, I review the systematic evidence of the nanotechnology in the C19 shots, the darkfield live blood findings, the research with Clifford Carnicom and my findings and documentation of the mechanism of self- assembly hydrogel filaments and blood toxicity. This phenomenon has been increasing in the level of contamination of the blood, the ill health effects from bioweapon shedding and environmental contamination.
According to Celeste Solum, who participated in an US Army Military Workshop in 2018 on Transhumanism, the US Army was predicting that by 2025 no natural humans would exist. Since my research is on unvaccinated C19 blood to alert the world of the de facto evidence of shedding, it is my conviction that we are dangerously close to fulfilling the goal of this transhumanist agenda.
“Transhumanism is the technology suite, I think, is the best way to put it, around the idea of the both mechanical and biological modification of humans. The RNA (mRNA)vaccines as an entry point (to transhumanism).”
Dr. Robert Malone
mRNA ‘Vaccines’ are the Gateway to Transhumanism, per Dr. Malone
In a recent interview with Glenn Beck, Dr. Robert Malone describes mRNA ‚vaccines‘ as the entry point for the suite of technologies that can modify humans through forced biological and mechanical genetic mutations. This is also known as transhumanism or Directed Evolution.
Dr. Malone rightfully earned the title of Inventor of mRNA Vaccine Technology per Dr. Malone’s websitewhere he lists his major publications and patents contributing to the invention of mRNA Vaccine Technology(which is nanotechnology) including Dr. Malone’s 1989 publication, “Cationic Liposome – Mediated RNA Transfection.”
You can watch the clip here as well. During the interview, Dr. Malone explains how the mRNA (RNA) ‘vaccines’ are the ‘ethical entry’ point to transhumanism. Dr. Malone describes transhumanism as the suite of nanotechnologies used to force or direct the the evolution of humans with non-human DNA and inorganic material (such as metallic-based electromagnetic molecules).
In a recent Yahoo! Finance article, Elon Musk says that humanoids will eventually outnumber humans (homo sapiens) resulting in devastating economic impact.
Bloomberg | Billionaire Peter Thiel Backs Fundraiser of Brain-Computer Firm | Media | Blackrock Neurotech
Electronic Nanoparticles are Not Lipids, They’re Nanotechnology
Per the paper’s abstract, Dr. Malone and two of his colleagues, “developed an efficient and reproducible method for RNA transfection, using a synthetic cationic lipid, incorporated into a liposome (lipofectin).”
BTW- a synthetic substance that carries an electronic charge is NOT a lipid. It’s a nanotechnology/electronic device. Being injected with lipids just sounds a heck of a lot better than being injected with electronic nanotechnologies. We were told electronic nanotechnologies are lipid encapsulated mRNA vaccines because no one in their right mind would agree to be injected with an electronic nanotechnology device.
Have Cationic Liposomes Ever Been Considered a Nanotechnology?
According to the December 2020 paper,
What is the Purpose of Cationic Nanotechnology?
Cationic means that the nanotechnology independently hosts a positive electronic charge (because after all technology that doesn’t host electricity on its own is just…a piece of metal-like material? Anyway…) Per the 1996 patent
How has Human Research with Nanotechnologies Been Allowed under the FDA and NIH Regulations?
Per
Lipofectin is Used to Integrate the Genetic Sequences of Aggressive Cancer into Humanized Cells
Lipofectin is also very effective at successfully integrating
Per the 1996 patent that Dr. Malone is listed as an inventor of,
When doctors at the
The Superantigen (SAg) spike protein, known as the Wuhan-Hu-1 S-2P, is programmed to be produced by cells in the human body by the mRNA found in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine
According to the
Nanoparticles Were Used in Past Respiratory Viruses
Alarmingly, the University of California San Diego and LaJolla mRNA nanotechnology experts claim, “
The authors make it clear that they
mRNA Vaccine Technology and “Respiratory Pandemic Technology” are the SAME Nanoparticle Technologies
The cationic
The ‘
The concept of the invention of “
When the harmful
Trust the Experts
We were told to simply
Why are experts referring to the nanotechnology bioweapons as ‘mRNA vaccines’ and starkly avoiding the term nanotechnology?
If Pfizer and Moderna have no problem plastering the term technology (nanotechnology) all over their websites, why are our trusted leaders accusing folks like me and Dr. Ana Mihalcea of being part of the ‘deep state’ or ‘not credible’ for pointing out that that the COVID-19 injections contain gene-editing nanotechnologies?
‘
Are Trusted Experts Invested in Humanity or Transhumanism?
Big Pharma, biotech, and other organizations and individuals who are invested in this gene-editing nanotechnology refer to this demonic invention as ‘
https://hdiac.org/articles/battlescape-brain-engaging-neuroscience-in-defense-operations/James Giordano, Ph.D., MPhil, is Professor in the Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry; Chief of the Neuroethics Studies Program, Co-director of the Program in Science and Global Health Law and Policy, and Chair of the Sub-program in Military Medical Ethics of the Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics at Georgetown University Medical Center. He is Senior Fellow of the Project on Biosecurity, Technology, and Ethics at the US Naval War College, Newport, RI; Bioethicist in the US Defense Medical Ethics Center; and 2020-21 Visiting Professor of Biomedicine and Humanities, Creighton University, NE. As well, he chairs the Neuroethics Subprogram of the IEEE Brain Initiative; is a Fellow of the Defense Operations Cognitive Science section, SMA Branch, Joint Staff, Pentagon; and is an appointed member of the Neuroethics, Legal and Social Issues Advisory Panel of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). He has previously served as Donovan Senior Fellow for Biosecurity at US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM); as Research Fellow and Task Leader of the EU-Human Brain Project Sub-Program on Dual-Use Brain Science; as an appointed member of the Department of Health and Human Services Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections (SACHRP); and as senior consultant to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Working Group on Dual-Use of International Neurotechnology. A Fulbright scholar, Dr. Giordano was awarded the JW Fulbright Visiting Professorship at the Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, GER, and currently is Distinguished Visiting Professor of Biotechnology, Health Promotions, and Ethics at the Coburg University of Applied Sciences, Coburg, GER. He was previously an International Fellow of the Centre for Neuroethics at the University of Oxford, UK. Prof. Giordano is the author of over 300 papers, 7 books, 21 book chapters, and 25 government white papers on brain science, national defense and ethics. His book, Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense: Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns (2015, CRC Press) is widely regarded and used as a definitive work on the topic. Prof. Giordano is a former US Naval officer, holding designations as an aerospace physiologist, research physiologist, and research psychologist, and served with the US Navy and Marine Corps. In recognition of his achievements he was elected to the European Academy of Science and Arts, and named an Overseas Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine (UK).
The Kingston Report. TRUTH WINS.
I struggled with whether or not to summarize this ‘autobiography’ in a clear and snappy fashion or to re-write it in a scientific and well-referenced format. (Even though the article is clearly written by a nanotechnology expert). For the past few days, my mind and my heart have been unable to take on this task. So here, unadulterated and unedited (but with references, imagery and links to related articles from the Kingston Report added) is “
Early concerns around graphene were sparked by previous research on another form of carbon — carbon nanotubes. It turns out that some forms of these fiber-like materials can cause serious harm if inhaled.
GRAPHENE/NANOTECHNOLOGY IN PCR TESTS https://www.nature.com/articles/am20137#MOESM2Biodistribution and pulmonary toxicity of intratracheally instilled graphene oxide in mice | NPG Asia Materials (nature.com) | Abstract Graphene and its derivatives (for example, nanoscale graphene oxide (NGO)) have emerged as extremely attractive nanomaterials for a wide range of applications, including diagnostics and therapeutics. In this work, we present a systematic study on the in vivo distribution and pulmonary toxicity of NGO for up to 3 months after exposure. Radioisotope tracing and morphological observation demonstrated that intratracheally instilled NGO was mainly retained in the lung. NGO could result in acute lung injury (ALI) and chronic pulmonary fibrosis. Such NGO-induced ALI was related to oxidative stress and could effectively be relieved with dexamethasone treatment. In addition, we found that the biodistribution of 125I-NGO varied greatly from that of 125I ions, hence it is possible that nanoparticulates could deliver radioactive isotopes deep into the lung, which might settle in numerous ‘hot spots’ that could result in mutations and cancers, raising environmental concerns about the large-scale production of graphene oxide.
GRAPHENE/NANOTECHNOLOGY IN VENTILATOR FILTERShttps://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/326610Graphene air filter traps and kills bacteria (medicalnewstoday.com). They (scientists) envisage the device being useful in hospitals and other healthcare settings.
Because changes (mutations) of genes cause cancer, researchers are looking at ways to manipulate genes to fight cancer.
Medical inventor and author Dr. David Martin proves that the Pfiser and Moderna mRNA vaccines are not vaccines by medical definition and how Big Pharma is using national and state emergency authorizations to force these untested gene therapies onto the population.
One form of gene therapy involves genetically modifying T cells (a type of immune cell)—see also Modified T cells. Doctors remove T cells from a person's blood and genetically modify them to recognize that person's specific cancer. When the modified T cells, called chimeric antigen receptor cells or CAR-T-cells, are put back in the person's bloodstream, they attack the cancer. CAR-T-cells can be used in people with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma.
New, still-experimental, techniques allow scientists to insert new genes into a cells, switch off abnormal genes, or increase the activity of helpful genes (see also Gene Therapy). Doctors hope these techniques may one day be useful for treating cancer.
What were the major sources of funding for clinical trials focused on the development of therapeutics and vaccines against COVID-19 between January 1, 2020, and August 31, 2021? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382437/
A further description of these and other risks and uncertainties can be found in Pfizer’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, and in its subsequent reports on Form 10-Q, including in the sections thereof captioned “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Information and Factors That May Affect Future Results”, as well as in its subsequent reports on Form 8-K, all of which are filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and available at www.sec.gov and www.pfizer.com. See also the Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook — Our 2022 Performance and — The Global Economic Environment sections of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) in Pfizer’s 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K; and the Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook — Our Third Quarter 2023 and First Nine Months of 2023 Performance and — The Global Economic Environment sections of MD&A in Pfizer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 1, 2023 (available at www.pfizer.com).
Federal Agency Name – Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Biological Technologies Office
Funding Opportunity Title – PREventing EMerging Pathogenic Threats
Funding Opportunity Number – HR001118S0017
DFARS 252.227-7014
About the HumanGenomeProject
When the Human Genome Project was officially launched back in 1990, it was envisioned as an international effort that would span 15 years with a price tag of $3 billion—$1 for each base of the genetic code. After a journal with many twists, turns and tribulations, this extraordinary quest was marked by a White House celebration in June 2000, and the publication of the first drafts of the human genome in February 2001.
It is 15 years since those first drafts of the human genome were published. From a solitary reference genome, there are now hundreds of thousands of decoded genomes, thanks to astonishing advances in next-generation sequencing. Our understanding of the biology of the human genome has grown, bolstered by projects that have built upon the foundation of the Human Genome Project, including the International HapMap project, The Cancer Genome Atlas, the ENCODE Project, and many more.
Particles for Humanity – And the Wind Cries Jeffrey Epstein: Biohacking Humans with DNA, Nanotechnology, IoT and 5G
JP Morgan Conference January 2019
Bridging the Gap Between Academic Research and Developing World Needs…
Why this is an important fragment to bring intentions to this matter?
Because of Jeffrey Epstein and his last will that leads us to Boris Nikolic the science adviser to Bill Gates who is also on the Board of JP Morgan and “Particles for Humanity” and make it possible to see the bigger picture of the story of our time.
Who is Boris Nikolic?
Epstein-named executor is former Bill Gates adviser
Bill Gates and Boris Nikolic attend Together To End AIDS: An Evening To Benefit amfAR and GBCHealth at John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on July 21, 2012 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Paul Morigi/Getty Images)
One of the men named in Jeffrey Epstein’s will as potentially being responsible for carrying it out says he was unaware he was included.
Epstein, the financier and convicted sex offender, signed a will detailing nearly $600 million in assets just two days before he killed himself in a Manhattan jail cell. In the will, he named biotech venture capitalist Boris Nikolic as „successor executor,“ the person who would take control of the estate if the two named executors are unable or unwilling to.
Nikolic, 49, said in a statement that he was „shocked“ that he was included.
A spokesperson for Nikolic confirmed to FOX Business that he „was never consulted on these matters and has no intent to fulfill these duties, whatsoever.“
As co-founder and managing director of health care and life sciences venture investing firm Biomatics Capital, Nikolic sits on the boards of directors for several of its portfolio companies.
A spokesperson for Nikolic told FOX Business that he and Epstein had no business ties. Nikolic has a broad network in the scientific world that overlapped with Epstein’s at points.
Both men were clients of the private bank at JPMorgan Chase & Co., where several people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg Epstein helped bankers attract lucrative new clients.
The executors of Epstein’s will receive $250,000. The document tallies cash and investments he said he had just before his death, which were then organized into a trust. The only potential beneficiary named is Epstein’s brother, Mark.
Is the Epstein and Maxwell story connected to COVID
We weed through the news you see on mainstream media in a truthful conversation about finding truth behind the story of Epstein and his connection to Bill Gates, and Covid.
How deeply involved was Jeffrey Epstein with developing Moderna’s vaccine?
12. Feb. 2024 Nikolic & Langer co-founded ‚ParticlesForHumanity‘ which is developing these skin-embedded vaccine records. PFH received initial funds from Bill Gates & …
• Eric S. Lander, M S Lauren M. Linton, Bruce Birren et al.: Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. In: Nature. Band 409, Nr. 6822, 15. Februar 2001, ISSN0028-0836, S. 860–921, doi:10.1038/35057062 (englisch, nature.com).
• S. G. Gregory, K. F. Barlow et al.: The DNA sequence and biological annotation of human chromosome 1. In: Nature. Band 441, 2006, S. 315–321, doi:10.1038/nature04727(englisch).
Trust Stamp is a vaccination based digital identity program funded by Bill Gates and implemented by Mastercard and GAVI, that will soon link your biometric digital identity to your vaccination records. The program said to “evolve as you evolve” is part of the Global War on Cash and has the potential dual use for the purposes of surveillance and “predictive policing” based on your vaccination history. Those who may not wish to be vaccinated may be locked out of the system based on their trust score.
Trust Stamp – Bill Gates Funded Program That Will Create Your Digital Identity Based On Your Vaccination History
The “Wellness Pass” Partnership
With the aim of being introduced in “low-income, remote communities” in West Africa and later replicated worldwide; the program is the result of a public-private partnership between the GAVI vaccine alliance backed by Bill Gates, Mastercard and Trust Stamp which is an AI-powered “identity authentication” company.
This program was to be first launched in late 2018. Trust Stamp’s advanced digital identification technology will be integrated into the GAVI-Mastercard initiative “Wellness Pass” – a digital vaccination record and identity system which is to be also linked to Mastercard’s click-to-play system powered by Mastercard’s AI and Machine Learning technology. MasterCard made a commitment that it will create a “centralized record keeping of childhood immunization”. It also describes itself as a leader towards a “World Beyond Cash”.
The future prospects of this GAVI and MasterCard partnership is worth exploring. This partnership with GAVI signifies a novel strategy aimed towards linking a biometric digital identity system, vaccination records, and a payment system into a single platform that is cohesive, coherent and synergistic.
Digital Health Passport
The program was launched two years ago and has been funded with $3.8 million in the GAVI donor funds. In addition to this it received a similar amount from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
It was in early June when GAVI reported thatMastercard’s Wellness Pass program has the potential to be adapted in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. A month after this, Mastercard announced that Trust Stamp’s advanced biometric identity platform will also be integrated into the Wellness Pass. This was done taking into consideration the Trust Stamp’s capability of providing biometric identity globally; even at places lacking internet access or cellular connectivity and also it does not require knowledge of an individual’s legal name or identity to function.
This Wellness Program involving GAVI, Mastercard, and Trust Stamp is soon going to be tested in West Africa. Similar program was also launched in the UK. The UK government is rolling out COVI PASS – Biometric RFID enabled Coronavirus Digital Health Passports to monitor nearly every aspect of citizens’ lives in the name of strengthening public health management through a military grade tech.
India funds Vaccine Cartel GAVI
The Indian government has pledged US $15 million to the global vaccine alliance GAVI over the next 5 years for the global Coronavirus vaccine project led by Britain. GAVI is largely led by the British government and Bill Gates. While the UK is GAVI’s largest funder, its implementation follows what is known as the” Gates approach”. Known as the Vaccine Cartel or Pharma Cartel by critics, such vaccines have been accused of causing atleast 38 million premature deaths worldwide.
While there is growing criticism against these organisations worldwide, India is again collaborating on similar initiatives on coronavirus vaccine with the same Vaccine Cartel. A consortium comprising Serum Institute, Gates Foundation, MIT, and Spy Biotech (a UK based biotech company) is trying to develop a vaccine using the new spy-tag vaccine development technology. A long-term Merck and Wellcome Trust venture on vaccine research, policy and manufacturing will be based in Delhi. (More details about this British led Indian Vaccination Program will be revealed in the next report.)
Trust Stamp’s Evergreen Hash
Trust Stamp has created a biometric identity system, using the technology called Evergreen Hash. This technology creates a “3D mask” based on a single photo, palm or fingerprint of a person. With the creation of this “mask” the “original data” is eliminated and “encrypted keys are created. These encrypted keys serve in place of a person’s name, fingerprint, and all the other information used for identification.
Digital Identification Program ID2020
The electoral commission of Ghana has been trying hard to put this idea into action before the general elections happen in December, 2020. The ‘budget allocation’ of the new system has been questioned. Bright Simons, the honorary VP of the IMAMI policy think tank, claimed that “unnecessarily registration of 17 million people all over again” signifies that million of dollars are “being blown” for reasons that are unexplained.
Jeffrey Epstein, Biohacking Humans with DNA, Nanotechnology, IoT and 5G are the focus of Domagoj Nikolić’s surrealistic article.
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author; they do not reflect the author’s employer or any entity whatsoever with which he has been, is now, or will be affiliated.
Could it be that the “vaccines” they want to push on us, using the corona pandemic as a pretext, are connected to some kind of a deranged transhumanistic scenario? Apparently, Jeffrey Epstein had a maniacal goal to seed the entire human race with his DNA. If I read between the lines correctly, the fulfilment of this “deed” would take injecting his genetic code into the DNA of every human.
However, spreading his genetic footprint on the whole of humanity by impregnating a bunch of rape victims or prostitutes, as was indicated by his loose talk, did not seem realistic.
It is well known that he used to hang out with prominent scientists from Harvard, MIT, etc. So, why did he so lavishly fund synthetic biology and genetic engineering?
Jeffrey Epstein and biotech research
Epstein not only donated his own funds, but also served as “an intermediary (with) other wealthy donors, soliciting millions of dollars in donations from individuals and organizations, including the technologist and philanthropist Bill Gates and the investor Leon Black.” By and large, the beneficiaries of his largesse had a deeper fund-raising relationshipwith him than they were willing to admit, and did their best to conceal the extents of their contacts.
Numerous Harvard geneticists, including George Church, have accepted Epstein donations. He has since then, like many others, issued an apology. However, knowing what we know today, we should not take either their judgement or motives as valid. We should also make note of the fact that the same George Church appeared as a member of the anti-corona genetics team.
His funding included more than $15M from donors such as DoD and National Institutes of Health (NIH). He “specialized in the area of nanoscience” and “became a ‘Strategic Scientist’ at Wuhan University of Technology (WUT)” that “awarded him more than $1.5 million to establish a research lab at WUT”.
An interesting article elaborating those connections was published on Joseph P. Farrell’s website, which reaffirmed that Lieber’s specialized research was nanotechnology aimed “to detect small viral particles in humans”.
What if Epstein’s reason for taking an interest in genetic science was precisely the plan to seed his genes throughout humanity through worldwide inoculation? A worldwide mandatory vaccination would certainly require a global pandemic as a pretext. That plan, although a gargantuan undertaking, would be certainly more feasible than seeding his DNA by impregnating a few dozens or hundreds of rape victims. And what if the plan included biohacking humans worldwide with nanotechnology devices?
In other words, what if the endgame is not just creating an Epsteinian chimera out of every human being, but also controlling the genetically modified humans with injected nanoparticles networked by the AI and IoT, just like it is already done on GMO animals? Is this the reason why we “need” the superfast and efficient 5G network? We know that major IT corporations, such as IBM and Microsoft, developed systems for biotechnology analytics, and with 5G they will finally have the technical infrastructure to connect practically an infinite number of nanodevices super-efficiently and control them in real time. For this reason we must always keep an eye on Epstein’s fellow “philanthropist” Bill Gates who was (is) a long time Jeffrey’s chum and made donations to MIT through Epstein and is now at the forefront of the global vaccination agenda.
There were numerous other top scientists involved in this network of global pedophile and underage sex organizations, human trafficking enterprises, biotech and bioweapons industry, AI revolution and vaccination cartel, one of them being another frequent flyer on Epstein airlines, also accused of sexual abuse which went hand in hand with scientific events at the Epstein’s private island. His name is Marvin Minsky, the renowned Harvard-educated AI pioneer, inventor of modern VR and augmented reality systems, founder of MIT’s Artificial Intelligence Lab, and a friend of the geneticist George Church.
Interstate biotech network, creepy organizations and their opposition
In 2017, Bill Gates co-founded the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) with the governments of Norway, India, Japan, and Germany along with the Wellcome Trust UK. The goal of the organization is to “accelerate the development of vaccines we’ll need to contain outbreaks” of future epidemics by, in Gate’s words, “using advances in genomics to map the DNA and RNA of pathogens and make vaccines.” Now the CEPI are scrambling to develop the corona vaccine.
Bill Gates in also one of the larger donors of Lucis Trust, a super-creepy “philanthropic” organization founded by esotericists Alice and Foster Bailey in the beginning of 1920s who at that time owned “Lucifer Publishing Company”. The name Lucis, according to the organization’s official website, is an esoteric version of the name Lucifer in whose “honor”, following the footsteps of theosophist Helena Blavatska who “sought to elicit a deeper understanding of the sacrifice made by Lucifer”, it was named. The goal of the Lucis Trust is “to implement the Plan”. Although the contents of the Plan have not been disclosed, we can further read that we are dealing with “Men of goodwill who co-operate (to) form part of the New Group of World Servers which is working to implement the Plan”. These people are “attempting to salvage the world, to bring order out of chaos and to defend the right as they see it”, and we can further learn that “the New Group of World Servers (…) are the people who are building the new world order”.
Another great donor of the Lucis Trust was George Soros who also invested around USD 3.86M to become a shareholder of the Wu Xi AppTec Group, a Chinese-American joint venture biotech holding company from Shanghai, allegedly connected with the corona virus leak and now scrambling to develop the antibodies and vaccines through one of its subsidiaries, and which recently inked a USD 3B deal for vaccines manufacturing. Although the official Facebook censors, Orwellian “fact-checking” services (in reality propaganda pushers and spinners) would like us to believe that the Wuhan labs had nothing to do with the invention of the covid virus, that Wu Xi AppTec Group does not have those capacities, and that Soros was not involved with those labs, just reading critically their texts shows evidence to the contrary. President Trump has repeatedly stated his belief that we are dealing with a manufactured virus originating from a Chinese lab, although his military and civilian intelligence services apparently disagree along with numerous others heads of states. However, according to the semi-official expose of the GRU – Russian military intelligence, they do agree with President Trump and Mike Pompeo. This kind of dissonance in the US state apparatus should not be surprising, if we recall that one of the main donors of the US-China biowarfare connection was the DoD and other similar linkages.
Hackable nanoparticles in digital software-like mRNA vaccines
Moderna makes “mRNA vaccines” by embedding the genetic instructions for a component of a virus into a nanoparticle, which can then be injected into a person. The company adds the genetic codes for the membrane protein the virus uses to invade human cells. If injected into a person, such nanoparticles could cause the body to immunize itself against the real contagion by disallowing the corona virus to fuse its receptors with membrane proteins. The volunteers in this genetic vaccine trial were asked to use birth control allegedly because the DNA could end up in the germline, in other words, in human reproductive cells, i.e. sperm and egg cells. It seems that someone wanted to guard against the possibility of mRNA-vaccine children being born. Could they have become the new Epsteins?
Since mRNA technology has a software, digital-like nature that functions very much like an operating system on a computer, a weblog entry of a military industrial complex contracting firm called Alpine Security deserves a very, very careful analysis.
A few important highlights:
“(…) Some nanotechnology ideas include a tiny device that gets injected into the body as a sensor or medical delivery device. (…)
(…) Some digital security experts posit that a single nanoparticle in the body with its own processor could be hacked, but they also say that if someone had more than one particle in the body, which many treatments would require, a hacker could theoretically turn them into a network in the body, using the body’s own systems to communicate and do their bidding. (…)
(…) If a hacker took over your inner nanotechnology devices, they could demand a ransom with fatal consequences. If you’re unable or unwilling to pay, they could easily turn your body against you and at the very least make you suffer or get sick, if not kill you. (…)
(…) One of the most exciting applications of nanotechnology is inhalable particulate powders developed to directly treat the lungs. These particles can work together to form an artificial cell to do a certain job. Some worry this tech could be an easily weaponized delivery method for bioter-rorism efforts, beyond the hacking dangers. Getting infected with something could be as simple as breathing the air, taking a shower or getting a regular vaccination from your doctor. (…)”
The possibility that someone could literally manage our bodies through the IoT network of nanoparticles controllable by the AI operated through a 5G system is, to put it mildly, shockingly disturbing. The potential consequences of misusing this technology are horrendous. Apart from the potential (and likely dubious) benefits, there are also risks associated with the unknown long-term consequences of manipulating human DNA. I also advise everyone to read the whole entry, because it does read like a transhumanist manifesto.
Are these people evil?
To sum it all up, there is a serious possibility that we may be dealing with a ramified network of business opportunists, tunnel-vision scientists, IT nerds, Beltway bandits, greedy financiers, corporate drones, media yes men, debauched sexual predators, human traffickers, ransomists, hijackers and a wide range of ordinary people or useful idiots, all puppeteered by a hidden transhumanist cabal who know very well what the end game is. This could indeed be a private network hacking nation states and, more importantly, biohacking humanity’s genetic code and maybe, just maybe, they use not only nanotechnology, but also Jeffrey’s (and God knows who else’s) DNA. I think that to dismiss this hypothesis flat out could be very, VERY naive.
Do I think that these people are all conspiring to depopulate the world sitting in darkened rooms around walnut tables? As Dean W. Arnold wrote here:
“I doubt it. (Well, Bill maybe.) Somebody is probably doing that, but my guess is that Bill and Melinda are admirable proponents of an ideology that believes they are helping the world. And when they run into facts that challenge their ideology, they do what many of us do at times. They block it out.
But somebody out there is cooking up evil.”
Epstein’s compartmentalized underground
Let us explore additional connections of this network with Epstein, which actually make our hypothesis of biohacking humanity quite credible. It is important to keep in mind that the modus operandi of this giant complex is compartmentalization. The network operates on a need to know basis and, in most cases, operatives do not see the whole picture but are guided by their simple goals.
Epstein had an executive assistant named Cimberly Espinosa with whom the Alpine Security founder (the nanotech – IoT – 5G blogger from above) shares the same last name. It could be just a coincidence, since that last name is quite common in the USA, but maybe there are connections.
Alpine Security is focused on ransomware and health care security, namely “protecting medical devices from profit, terror assassination and enemy advancement”.
The founder of the company originates, without a shadow of a doubt, from the military industrial complex. Before starting his own company, he worked as a senior consultant for a cyber technology firm called TechGuard specializing, again, in anti-ransom technology. Their government clients include DHS, DoD, DOL, DISA, MARFORCYBER, USCYBERCOM, FLYCYBERCOM, etc., etc.
Whitney Webb wrote of Epstein’s connections with CyberReason, another shadowy tech firm, deeply connected to the obscure Unit 8200 of the Israeli Defense Force (IDF). CyberReason was founded by an extremely suspicious person named Lior Div, a former Israeli military hacker who regards his company as “the continuation of the six years of training and service he spent working with the Israeli army’s 8200 Unit.” After he left the IDF, he “worked for the Israeli government as a private contractor reverse-engineering hacking operations”.
Their portfolio includes, similarly, anti-ransom and health care. Such products can obviously be easily weaponized and, once developed, whoever has such capabilities is only a step away (with a simple reversal) from being in the position to blackmail just about anyone on the planet. CyberReason’s management roster reads like a who-is-who of an Israeli techspook yearbook including a lady who “commanded 24/7 operational team of 20 Intelligence specialists on mission‐critical sensitive tasks” in IDF. I am reluctant to imagine what those “mission-critical sensitive tasks” could have been.
It is also interesting that Cimberly Espinosa was formerly part of a tech firm called M86 Security a military contractor provably connected to Microsoft and Israel through connections with another tech firm called Finjan and Trustwave Holdings, another military contractor, inter alia. The Trustwave website indicates intelligence agencies and the military as their clients, but the list remains undisclosed, as is the norm in the military contracting underworld. Trustwave has been very closely affiliated with, not surprisingly, Microsoft for over a decade. And, also not surprisingly, to Israel.
Cimberly Espinosa is now part of Thales Avionics focusing on avionic cyber security which, curiously, is also in the focus of Alpine Security founder. If we take a look at his personal presentation page on Maryville University’s website where he used to teach, we will find interesting passages, such as this one “some of the notable projects I’ve worked on have included penetration testing for commercial aircraft – to help make aircraft “hackproof” while in flight and on ground”. Similar technologies could have been misused in hijacking of the planes during any dubious disaster, such as 9-11 or the disappearance of the Malaysian Airlines Flight 370.
Again, so typical of the military industrial complex, the portfolio of clients is not available on his company website, but we can guess that Thales Avionics is part of the network, since it would appear that they often rub elbows on industry fairs.
The same Cimberly Espinosa also appears on the web as a Californian realtor, which is most probably a red herring put out there to give a regular civil identity to an important operator.
And here we come close to almost closing the circle. Who is Trustwave closely affiliated to?
The following passages also require a close examination:
“Cybereason’s proprietary AI-powered data analytics engine and built-in forensic capabilities to correlate data attributes and behavior with potential threats. The heightened correlation will assist in rapidly pinpointing suspicious activities that may require further investigation or annihilation of attacks already in progress.”
“…deeper analysis of dubious events can be initiated and cross referenced using up-to-the-second threat intelligence obtained from the Trustwave global network of Advanced Security Operation Centers (ASOCs) and the Trustwave SpiderLabs Fusion Center, a state-of-the-art cyber-command center, to help ensure effective measures against threats are immediately taken.”
“…threat hunters and digital forensic teams will add to their arsenal a new level of behavioral analytics to extend and magnify their abilities for quickly finding those proverbial needles in the haystack.”
Biohacking humanity is a real possibility
With only a little bit of educated imagination, this cyber technology, if/when combined with biotechnology, could lead to a total military-style takeover of humanity. It seems that we are only a step away from developing search-and-destroy capabilities powered by AI, 5G, “state-of-the-art cyber-command centers” and “vaccine” – injected hackable nanotechnology devices, weaponized as a form of bioterrorism, and one step removed from whom? From the famous “philanthropist” Jeffrey Epstein through his own connections with CyberReason and many of the mentioned research organizations and technologies providers.
Also initiatives such as digital ID implants combined with vaccines pushed by Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundationcould only make the process of search and destroy (and, on the flip side, search and rescue) faster and easier to manage. We should add that the Gates Foundation funded an MIT and Institute of Chemistry of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing study of a tattoo-like vaccine combining nanoparticles or “near-infrared quantum dots” encoding information for “decentralized data storage and bio-sensing” combining in vivo smartphone imaging and machine learning algorithms. If we combine that technology with implants wirelessly tracking and transmitting real-time data from nerves, organs and muscles, the bio-hybrid DNA creepy crawlers-nanobots, 5G and “state-of-the-art cyber-command centers”,the hackable network for remote controlling humanity is all in place.
The brief research only scratches the surface of the transhumanistic-underground-network hacking governments and there are many leads to be investigated in this massively ramified secret tech-cult. Again, this is not to say that every agent in the network knows the endgame. On the contrary, the success of such operations hinges on compartmentalization and secrecy. However, it is quite apparent that those in command are hellbent on biohacking humanity in order to establish a transhumanist tyranny and who knows what else (chimerical experiments, anyone?), probably a fully-fledged GMO Orwellian Animal Farm, and much, much unimaginable more.
Another spider in the world-wide web
For further research, another spider in the web to be investigated is Boris Nikolic, “an immunologist and biotech entrepreneur who formerly served as Gates’ chief scientific adviser until 2014” who “served as an intermediary between Epstein and Gates” but now “deeply regret(s) ever meeting Mr. Epstein” and “was ‘shocked’ to see he was named alternate (will) executor by Epstein.”
Nikolic should owe a lot to Epstein and I don’t think regrets the event in which he “was excited about advice Epstein — who was fascinated with genetic research — had given to bankers about the public offering of a gene company that Nikolic had a $42 million stake in, Bloomberg reported at the time.”
Call me again whatever, but I don’t think Jeffrey Epstein is dead. It just does not add up. The possibility that he was replaced with a double and extracted sounds more plausible than ever. And it could be that the corona mess in New York is somehow connected with his “demise”.
Maybe he will reemerge from the realm of shadows in some sort of a sick triumphal “reincarnation”? In any case, even if he is dead, his spirit is not and his DNA certainly isn’t.
And the wind cries Jeffrey…
The rest of the restore Content of the deleted page from particles for humanity:
Each year, we at BostInno look back at our coverage from the last 12 months — all the launches, funding rounds, new deals and partnerships, awards and more — and try to identify the startups that are on the precipice of something big.NOV23
Particles for Humanity is working on a solution: new technology that makes it possible to deliver multiple doses in a single shot. The startup recently received a $5 million grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to evaluate the technology, which was developed at an MIT lab and has been tested successfully in animals.NOV18
Single injection vaccines could increase access and reduce burden on healthcare systems globally
Cambridge, MA (November 18, 2020)—Particles for Humanity, a biotechnology company transforming early-stage technologies into products for people in low-resource settings, has received a $5 million grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The funding will be used to evaluate a Single Injection (SI) vaccine delivery technology that delivers all the doses required for full immunization in one injection. The technology, published in Science, was invented at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), by Drs. Robert Langer and Ana Jaklenec, and made available to the company under an option agreement with MIT.JUL8
Stabilizing vitamin A during cooking and storage could enable bouillon cube of the future
Cambridge, MA (July 8, 2020)—Particles for Humanity, a healthcare company transforming early-stage technologies into products for people in low-resource settings, has received $5 million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to develop a product that has potential to help millions of people who suffer serious medical consequences from malnutrition. The technology, licensed from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), was invented in the renowned Langer Lab by Drs. Robert Langer and Ana Jaklenec, and published in Science and Translational Medicine.JAN7TO JAN 9
Jeffrey Epstein Raked In $200 Million After Legal and Financial Crises
Jeffrey Epstein’s biggest client had deserted him, his money management firm had lost more than $150 million during the financial crisis, and he was a registered sex offender. But after he started a new company with a wildly speculative business plan in 2012, Mr. Epstein had no problem pulling in cash.
[Jeffrey Epstein’s charity: An image boost built on deception.]
His start-up, Southern Trust, reported more than $200 million in revenues over the next five years, according to a review of previously unreported financial statements filed in the Virgin Islands.
Despite a name that calls to mind a financial services firm, the fledgling company with a handful of employees said it was developing a DNA data-mining service. Southern Trust was trying to gauge customers’ predisposition to cancer by “basically organizing mathematical algorithms,” Mr. Epstein told Virgin Islands officials as he sought a lucrative tax break in 2012.
In the case of Boris Nikolic, after being introduced to Epstein through Melanie Walker, he attended a 2011meeting with Gates and Epstein where he was photographed alongside James Staley, then a senior JP Morgan executive, and Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and a close Epstein associate. Nikolic was chief adviser for science and technology to Bill Gates at the time, advising both the Gates Foundation and bgC3. According to the mainstream narrative, this is supposed to be the first time that Gates and Epstein had ever met. In addition, this may have been when Epstein pitched the joint Gates Foundation–JP Morgan “global health charitable fund.”
The 2011 meeting at Jeffrey Epstein’s Manhattan mansion attended by James E. Staley, Larry Summers, Jeffery Epstein, Bill Gates and Boris Nikolic.
In 2014, Nikolic “waxed enthusiastic” about Epstein’s supposed penchant for financial advice ahead of a public offering for a gene-editing company that Nikolic had a $42 million stake in. Notably, both Nikolic and Epstein were clients of the same group of bankers at JP Morgan, with Bloomberg later reporting that Epstein regularly helped those bankers attract wealthy new clients.
In 2016, Nikolic cofounded Biomatics capital, which invests in health-related companies at “the convergence of genomics and digital data” that are “enabling the development of superior therapeutics, diagnostics and delivery models.” Nikolic founded Biomatics with Julie Sunderland, formerly the director of the Gates Foundation’s Strategic Investment Fund.
At least three of the companies backed by Biomatics—Qihan Biotech, eGenesis, and Editas—were cofounded by George Church, a Harvard geneticist with deep ties to Epstein and also closely associated with the Edge Foundation. Biomatics investment in Qihan Biotech is no longer listed on the Biomatics website. Church’s Qihan Biotech seeks to produce human tissues and organs inside pigs for transplantation into humans, while eGenesis seeks to genetically modify pig organs for use in humans. Editas produces CRISPR gene-editing “medicines” and is also backed by the Gates Foundation as well as Google Ventures.
After Epstein’s death in 2019, it was revealed that Nikolic had been named the “successor executor” of Epstein’s estate, further suggesting close ties to Epstein despite Nikolic’s claims to the contrary. After details of Epstein’s will were made public, Nikolic did not sign a form indicating his willingness to be executor and did not ultimately servein that role.
Despite the relatively abrupt shift in the mainstream media regarding what is acceptable to discuss regarding the Jeffrey Epstein–Bill Gates relationship, many of these same media outlets refuse to acknowledge much of the information contained in this investigative report. This is particularly true in the case of the Evening Standard article and Bill Gates’s odd relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell’s sister Isabel and CommTouch, the company Isabel previously led.
The likely reason for the continued cover-up of the true extent of Epstein’s ties to Gates has much more to do with Gates’s company Microsoft than with Bill Gates himself. While it is now permissible to report on ties that discredit Gates’s personal reputation, the information that could tie his relationship with Epstein and the Maxwells to Microsoft has been omitted.
If, as the Evening Standard reported, Epstein did make millions out of his business ties with Gates prior to 2001 and if Gates’s ties to Isabel Maxwell and the Israeli espionage–linked company CommTouch were to become public knowledge, the result could easily be a scandal on a par with the PROMIS software affair. Such a disclosure could be very damaging for Microsoft and its partner the World Economic Forum, as Microsoft has become a key player in the WEF’s Fourth Industrial Revolution initiatives that range from digital identity and vaccine passports to efforts to replace human workers with artificial intelligence.
There are clearly powerful actors with a vested interest in keeping the Epstein-Gates narrative squarely focused on 2011 and later—not necessarily to protect Gates but more likely to protect the company itself and other top Microsoft executives who appear to have been compromised by Epstein and others in the same intelligence-linked network.
This is hardly an isolated incident, as similar efforts have been made to cover up (or memory hole) the ties of Epstein and the Maxwells to other prominent Silicon Valley empires, such as those led by Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk. One key reason for this is that the Epstein network’s blackmail operation involved not only sexual blackmail but electronic forms of blackmail, something used to great effect by Robert Maxwell on behalf of Israeli intelligence as part of the PROMIS operation. Given its nature, electronic forms of blackmail through illegal surveillance or backdoored software can be used to compromise those in power with something to hide, but who were uninclined to engage in the exploitation of minors, such as those abused by Epstein.
That Isabel and Christine Maxwell were able to forge close business ties with Microsoft after having been part of the front company that played a central role in PROMIS-related espionage and after explicitly managing their subsequent companies with the admitted intention to “rebuild” their spy father’s work and legacy, strongly points to the probability of at least some Microsoft products having been compromised in some fashion, likely through alliances with Maxwell-run tech companies. The lack of mainstream media concern over the documented ties of the Epstein network to other top Microsoft executives of the past, such as Nathan Myhrvold, Linda Stone, and Steven Sinofsky, makes it clear that, while it may be open season on the relationship between Bill Gates and Epstein, such is not the case for Microsoft and Epstein.
The ties of Epstein and the Maxwells to Silicon Valley, not just to Microsoft, are part of a broader attempt to cover up the strong intelligence component in the origin of Silicon Valley’s most powerful companies. Much effort has been invested in creating a public perception that these companies are strictly private entities despite their deep, long-standing ties to the intelligence agencies and militaries of the United States and Israel. The true breadth of the Epstein scandal will never be covered by mainstream media because so many news outlets are owned by these same Silicon Valley oligarchs or depend on Silicon Valley for online reader engagement.
Perhaps the biggest reason why the military/intelligence origins and links to the current Silicon Valley oligarchy will never be honestly examined, however, is that those very entities are now working with breakneck speed to usher in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which would make artificial intelligence, automation, mass electronic surveillance, and transhumanism central to human society. One of the architects of this “revolution,” Klaus Schwab, said earlier this year that rebuilding and maintaining trust with the public was critical to that project. However, were the true nature of Silicon Valley, including its significant ties to serial child rapist and sex trafficker Jeffery Epstein and his network, to emerge, the public’s trust would be significantly eroded, thus threatening what the global oligarchy views as a project critical to its survival.
Jeffrey Epstein gave more money to science after his conviction than previously acknowledged, including to famous researchers, leading universities, an independent artificial-intelligence pioneer, and even a far-right YouTuber who took Epstein’s money to make videos on neuroscience.
An extensive BuzzFeed News review of Epstein’s donations, public acknowledgments of funding, and meetings that happened after his release from jail shows that his links to top scientists continued after he was convicted for sex crimes in 2008.
Epstein’s scientific friends, including Harvard mathematical biologist Martin Nowak and celebrity physicist Lawrence Krauss, introduced him to other leading scientists after his release from jail. The full extent of Epstein’s largesse may be millions of dollars higher than the sums recorded by his foundations in filings to the IRS because Epstein’s philanthropy is entangled with that of his billionaire associate Leon Black.
Epstein, who killed himself in a Manhattan federal detention center while facing charges of trafficking dozens of underage girls for sex, loved to hang out with scientists and fund their work.
“As some collect butterflies, he collects beautiful minds,” a 2002 New York magazine profile noted. After Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor for prostitution, which saw him serve just 13 months in a Florida jail, some intellectuals cut ties with him.
“I told JE explicitly that I could not and would not accept any further support from him,” Howard Gardner, a Harvard University specialist in cognitive science and education who thanked Epstein in a 2005 book for research support and “valued friendship,” told BuzzFeed News by email.
But Epstein continued to court other scientists, some of whom remained willing to take his money.
Our list of Epstein’s post-conviction scientific associates is almost certainly incomplete — his foundations touted support for many projects that could not be corroborated, and some tax filings seem to be missing from the record.
Leon Black
The entanglement between Epstein’s philanthropy and that of Black, CEO of the private equity firm Apollo Global Management, adds to the confusion.
Martin Nowak
Nowak, a Harvard mathematical biologist, seems to have been Epstein’s favorite scientist, regularly mentioned in press releases issued by his foundations. The financier donated $6.5 million to launch Nowak’s Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard in 2003 — although Epstein claimed, apparently falsely, to have given $30 million.
ADVERTISEMENT
Nowak, who had not previously commented since Epstein’s indictment in July, told BuzzFeed News by email: “The only donation from Epstein was received in 2003. The money was spent by about 2007.”
Still, Nowak thanked Epstein for financial support in his 2011 book, Supercooperators, on the evolution of altruism, and in atleastsixscientificpaperspublished between 2009 and 2012 on topics including the spread of cancer through the body and the evolution of HIV. “Most research projects take many years from first idea until publication,” Nowak said.
Nowak also continued to facilitate meetings between Epstein and leading academics at Harvard and MIT. Pictures from one meetingin 2012, on an archived version of one of Epstein’s foundation websites, show him at Nowak’s office with a group including mathematician and geneticist’sEric Lander, director of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, and David Gergen of the Harvard Kennedy School, a CNN political analyst and former adviser to presidents Nixon, Ford, Reagan, and Clinton.
Also pictured were Black and Gardner, Harvard geneticist George Church; MIT physicist Seth Lloyd; Ted Kaptchuk, a Harvard expert on the placebo effect; and Henry Rosovsky, an economist and former dean of Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Cases of malaria are now being reported in Florida and this is after the company Oxitec released genetically modified mosquitos ostensibly to keep them from transmitting the virus. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation helps fund Oxitec. The MSM is, of course, running cover for Bill Gates and Oxitec. The crap-piece of an article mentions that the genetically modified mosquitos released are male and not the females which are the ones that suck blood and bite you. What it leaves out is that previous Oxitec mosquito experiments failedand that not only did some of the supposedly sterile males reproduce but that the gene alterations had shifted to the overall mosquito population.
The user LGBT (Leftists Get Bullets Too) from Twitter and Odyssey has revealed an even more troubling aspect to this. The technology that led to the creation of the genetically altered mosquitos is called gene drive. It allows genetic traits to be passed down to offspring 100% of the time. Misused it can destroy entire species and ruin ecosystems. Scientists also warned against their potential use as a bioweapon. LGBT notes that Jeffrey Epstein was heavily involved with the HarvardProgram for Evolutionary Dynamics. Sure enough, Harvard is involved in creating gene drivetechnology. Read to the end to see some of LGBT’s fantastic work on the topic.
Upon research I immediately found that the Wyss Institute at Harvard was involved in gene drives. This adds another element to the Epstein connection. Hansjorg Wyss is accused of sexual assault and was once part of a lawsuit for committing illegal and deadly human experimentation. Five elderly patients were killed by injecting bone cement into their spine. Four people were jailed for this but Hansjorg Wyss, the owner of the company, got away scot-free. Wyss is also notable for his being a huge donor to Arabella Advisors, the Democrat dark money group.
(Hansjorg Wyss and Michael Bloomberg at the Ghislaine Maxwell affiliated Oceana)LOL
Now for the link Wyss has to Jeffrey Epstein. Gene drive technology was first created by Kevin Esvelt and George Church. “George McDonald Church was a founding member of the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard… He lists the nonprofit Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation, a private foundation established by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, as a source of funding. According to George Church’s Harvard website, this funding started in 2005 and continues to the present.” Source.
So, to sum up, Oxitec releasing genetically modified mosquitos in Florida that were created with research funded by Hanjorg Wyss who works with Epstein eugenicist scientist George Church. God help us all!
Graphene oxide is detected in the body by specialized cells of the immune system
Researchers at Karolinska Institutet, the University of Manchester and Chalmers University of Technology have shown that the human immune system handles graphene oxide in a manner similar to pathogens, possibly leading to safer biomedical applications in the future.
Graphene oxide is currently being studied for use in various drug delivery methods and other medical applications (among other non-medical applications). However, it is of critical importance to understand how these materials interact with the body. The study shows that neutrophils, the most common type of white blood cell specialized in combating infections, release so-called neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) when encountering GO. NETs are made up of a „spider-web“ of DNA decorated with proteins that help neutrophils to destroy microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi.
The researchers found that GO causes specific changes in the lipid composition of the cell membrane of neutrophils leading to the release of NETs. They could also show that antioxidant treatment reversed this process. In a companion study published in Nanoscale, it was shown that GO is degraded in NETs, much like bacteria and other pathogens.
„Taken together, these studies show that GO can be trapped and degraded in NETs just like pathogens. Understanding how the immune system senses and handles GO paves the way for safer biomedical applications of GO and other graphene-based materials, for instance in the context of drug delivery“, say the researchers.
This essay is going to ramble a bit because we need to build a framework of links as a foundation for our main point. Some apparently disparate elements are closely connected as part of a broader agenda, but we need first to identify the relationships.
We begin with a brief review of ZIKA, this 2015 outbreak in South America of a virus so mild that it had never done anything to anybody. ZIKA normally produces symptoms such as a slight fever or conjunctivitis and sometimes joint pain, but typically so mild that the symptoms last for only a few days and most people don’t even know they have it. ZIKA is not contagious but is transmitted by mosquitoes, which means you must be bitten by an infected mosquito to contract it.
There is much about the ZIKA outbreak that is important to our story. You may want to read my prior article on ZIKA to fully understand. (1) For now, we can note that the outbreak was accompanied by an intense flood of carefully-organised media propaganda with an astonishing amount of fear-mongering about a small number of unrelated birth defects (microcephaly), leading to enormous pressure on Latin American governments to eliminate their anti-abortion legislation. This appears to have been the entire purpose of the media flood, and it was rather successful in that three countries capitulated.
Perhaps the most important point is that there was never any explanation for ZIKA’s sudden decision to travel more than 12,000 kilometers from Micronesia to abruptly appear in Brazil, nor for its ability to almost instantaneously infect countless millions of people in more than 20 countries covering nearly 20 million square kilometers. The official WHO version was that ZIKA was „believed to have been brought to Brazil by an infected visitor to the World Cup“, a statement that appeared superficially credible but which constituted logical rubbish. There was no way that one or a few infected travelers could have been bitten by hundreds of millions of local mosquitoes who in turn became infected and then spread over 20 million square kilometers in a month. In any case, ZIKA was in Brazil long before the World Cup.
There was one crucial fact that was heavily suppressed by the mass media: A UK company named Oxitec had been conducting „trans-genic“ mosquito trials in all these areas immediately prior to the mass regional outbreak. The theory was to release billions of sterile mosquitoes which would mate with the local species and produce sterile offspring, thereby eradicating the local mosquito population. I will expand on this later, but Oxitec’s „trials“ all proved to have been failures, with no resultant reduction in local populations and with a frightening gene transfer from the trans-genic insects to the local species. Since ZIKA was not endemic to Brazil or indeed to South-Central America, it had to be introduced from somewhere, and on a massive scale. In light of all the evidence, the only possible conclusion was that Oxitec’s billions of mosquitoes were knowingly infected with the ZIKA virus prior to release in South America. No other conclusion is even slightly credible.
ZIKA and Microcephaly
The entire thrust of the vast media flood and the truly emphatic and frightening fear-mongering were directed to the risk of a birth defect called microcephaly, which was played up to a simply ridiculous extent and blamed on the ZIKA virus. First, to put this into perspective, the number of microcephaly births in all of Latin America was around 2,000 in a total population of about 650 million. But the main point is that these birth defects occurred almost 100% in the precise areas where spraying had been done with the insecticide pyroxiprophen (a „hormone disruptor“), on the powerful recommendation of the WHO (who else?). Further, these birth defects occurred immediately after the spraying and as much as two years prior to the outbreak of ZIKA. On the basis of all the evidence, any connection between ZIKA and microcephaly is fraudulent. My prior article mentioned above, contains all the necessary references. This is important because the Western media are now re-floating this theory to justify what will become a new flood of vaccinations.
One article stated: „The evidence is now certain. After the suspicions that for months had led the major organizations in the world to work to demonstrate the connection between Zika and some malformations, we now have a scientific basis to confirm it: the virus causes the rare birth defect, microcephaly, and other serious brain problems. The evidence was published in the New England Journal of Medicine by CDC researchers, who made a thorough review of the available scientific evidence related to the Zika virus and birth defects.“ (2) I cannot understand why even the scientific journals have become a party to this fraud, because there has never been proven any connection between ZIKA and birth defects, and no flavivirus has ever been implicated in such things.
The same article states further: „Surveys say a lot of people are not worried about Zika virus infection in the United States [because] they don’t know much about it,“ said Dr. Sonja Rasmussen. About 700 people in the United States have been infected with the Zika virus according to reports, including 69 pregnant women, Dr. Anne Schucat, deputy director of the C.D.C., said at a White House briefing. About half of the cases are in Puerto Rico . . . According to the most recent projections, mosquitoes that can transmit the virus will be active in 30 U.S. states during the warmer months, a much wider range than initially predicted by health officials.“ (3)
It is important to draw attention to the fact that apparently all of Oxitec’s mosquito trials have failed, many widely (and loudly) denounced as failures by the local governments, but with this information blockaded by the Western media. Some trials produced a temporary drop in local mosquito populations, but which soon recovered to prior levels. (4) (5) In one trial in Brazil in 2015 (the time of ZIKA) Oxitec released around 500,000 mosquitoes every week for 27 weeks in one city. The insects contained a gene modification that would supposedly prevent mosquitoes from reaching the adult stage and thus being unable to reproduce, the dispersed insects themselves predicted to die out in total. But the dispersed mosquitoes didn’t die out, and their offspring did in fact reproduce. Moreover, researchers from Yale University examined the mosquitoes and discovered that the ‚transgenic‘ gene alterations had unexpectedly migrated into the target population of local mosquitoes. (6)
But now things take a surprising turn. ZIKA didn’t disappear after South America; it moved to the US where it was busily engaged in Gain of Function research. Researchers at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology in San Diego, recreated ZIKA in their labs and, using both cells and animals (and humans, from what I understand), tried to learn what would happen when Zika was repeatedly transmitted between different animal species as well as when repeatedly passed back and forth from mosquito cells to mice. The virus naturally experienced mutations during these procedures, which increased its ability to replicate, to perhaps bypass natural immunity, and to become rather dangerous to humans. (7) (8)
This danger to humans of course will require vaccinations, most especially if expecting mothers in the US and Europe can be frightened out of their wits with fears of microcephaly as was done so successfully in South America. This wouldn’t normally matter to us because ZIKA travelled from Polynesia only to South and Central America, and died there. ZIKA has never existed in North America, so we needn’t be concerned.
Oxitec Mosquito trials in Florida and California
Well, we needn’t be concerned, except for the fact that Oxitec has already been conducting the same „trans-genic“ mosquito trials in the US, beginning with Florida and California. And lo and behold, ZIKA has suddenly been detected in both Florida and California, where it will almost certainly exhibit the precise mutations discovered at the La Jolla Institute in San Diego. Thus, all pregnant women can become terrified of the prospect of their infants suffering from microcephaly and can all line up for yet another vaccine – which, coincidentally, is already in production and trials. (9)
It is disappointing that the Scientific America article is almost pure propaganda and replete with misinformation and outright falsehoods. In one part, the article quotes a ’scientist‘ as saying, „Oxitec’s technology for releasing genetically modified insects has been tested in other places. [The company has] reported reaching Aedes aegypti population suppression of more than 90 percent in many of their releases. . .“ It is true that Oxitec’s technology has been tested in other places, but none of those have been successful. The claim that they have achieved a 90% suppression rate is an outright lie. There have been a few examples of high suppression rates, but those were very short-lived and within a year or so the mosquito populations were back to prior levels, and with a more immune and genetically-altered species. Scientific American’s article is frighteningly fraudulent.
Here Comes Doomsday
This article isn’t really about ZIKA, and only peripherally about COVID-19. It’s about something much more sinister, and it began long before either ZIKA or COVID-19. It is about universal worldwide vaccinations. I would remind you here of the quote by a Robert Kagan look-alike who stated that the only way to take full control of the world’s populations would be to „line everyone up and give them a vaccination.“
In 2008 the Gates Foundation arranged with Professor Hiroyuki Matsuoka of Jichi Medical University in Japan to manufacture a revolutionary type of GM mosquito. Through artificial genetic alterations, instead of infecting victims with yellow fever or malaria, the insects would instead be made capable of administering vaccines – as for COVID-19. Gates initially paid Professor Hiroyuki $100,000 to begin this process, and offered $1,000,000 to any technician successful in creating what he called „flying syringes“. Gates planned on mass-producing these gene-therapy mosquitoes and distributing them worldwide. (13) (14) (15) (16)
PubMed ran an article on it: Abstract; 2010 Aug. (17) „We are producing a transgenic mosquito, a flying syringe, to deliver a vaccine protein to human beings via the saliva the mosquito deposits in the skin while biting. The mosquito produces a vaccine protein in the salivary gland and deposits the protein into the host’s skin when it takes the host’s blood. We allowed the CSP-expressing mosquitoes to feed on mice to induce the production of anti-CSP antibody . . . Further techniques and trials are required in order to realize vaccine-delivering mosquitoes.“
These people had a brilliant idea and the process was simple: „If we can infect billions of mosquitoes with ZIKA, and have those billions of mosquitoes infect hundreds of millions of people with ZIKA, why can’t we infect those same mosquitoes with the spike protein from Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, and have the mosquitoes give hundreds of millions of people a COVID vaccination?“Take that, anti-vaxxers! An enormous plus is that this would be done in secrecy and informed consent is unnecessary for mosquito bites. Another huge plus is that the spike protein wouldn’t be stuck in the musculature but would be injected directly into the blood vessels, thus having transportation throughout the entire body and able to lodge wherever it could do the most good – or the most harm, depending on which side of the fence you are sitting on. An additional feature is that a denial would be the only defense necessary since proof would be almost impossible to obtain.
The only negative feature is that mosquitoes, being the haphazard little creatures they are, would bite people at random with no sense for equal distribution. This would mean that some unlucky humans would be bitten rarely or not at all, while the very lucky might receive 200 or more „booster shots“. Still, a small obstacle considering that we will have many mosquito seasons to even out the ‚vaccinations‘. Too good to be true, and very cost-effective.
Initial results were unsatisfactory, but in a report on the Japanese study published in the April 2015 issue of Insect Molecular Biology, the researchers added an antigen – a compound that triggers an immune response – to the protein mix in the prototype mosquito’s saliva, and apparently produced the desired results, that the mosquitoes carrying the desired item (such as a spike protein) would indeed release it into the victim while drawing blood, much as they might infect a person with ZIKA or malaria. According to the report in Insect Molecular Biology, mice bitten by Hiroyuki’s mosquitoes did indeed produce the desired antibodies in the victims. Science Now reported the same successes.
They ran articles on this until 2015, then suddenly all the references disappeared. The Press Release by Shigeto Yoshida from the Jichi Medical University in Japan, that boasted of ’success‘, has been deleted from the Internet, and the published reports up to 2020 and 2021 are now either deleted („It seems you’re in search of a page that doesn’t exist“), or „Access Forbidden“. The studies published in Insect Molecular Biology and in Science Now, are unavailable. A wall of secrecy has been built around this entire topic, and the mainstream media (to the extent they touch this at all) now dismiss it as „An interesting proof of principle that’s unlikely to be put into practice.“ (18)
Thus, the case is closed and the entire topic has gone dark. I find this alarming because of the eerie similarity to other such „discoveries“ that have suffered a similar fate. In 2001 scientists at the Epicyte bio-lab in San Diego created a GM contraceptive corn,having discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack sperm. Their researchers isolated the genes that regulate the manufacture of these antibodies and inserted them into corn plants, creating horticultural factories that make contraceptives. Shortly after the 2001 Epicyte press release, the company was taken over by Biolex and all discussion of the breakthrough vanished. Nothing more was heard in any media about the development of spermicidal corn. (19)
There is much more on this that you should read: (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26)
Similarly, seed and bio-chemical companies were in the recent past suddenly promoting the use of cotton seeds as a primary foodstuff for underdeveloped countries. Cotton seeds are toxic, containing a chemical called gossypol which is an effective male sterilant.[40] The seed companies claimed to have removed this toxin to a safe level, but there is no safe level for gossypol. Even very minute doses taken repeatedly (as when used for a basic food) will render an entire male population sterile. This ‚discovery‘ and promotion also suddenly disappeared. NPR produced an article on it about four years ago (27), but that seems to be the end.
Concerns for Fertility. Is This About Sterilisation and Depopulation?
I think it is easy to become paranoid about the depopulation movement and begin seeing things that aren’t there. But still, when we learn of a new GM seed or learn of another WHO or other vaccination program (including that for COVID-19), it just seems that much too often these have an „anti-fertility agenda“ built into them.
I have mentioned in several articles how the WHO, Bill Gates, and Rothschild conspired to sterilise about 150 million women in undeveloped countries without their knowledge or consent. (28) But the WHO didn’t stop there. In 2015, the WHO decided to blanket Kenya with a new polio vaccine – for no apparent purpose and with an odd stipulation of repeated vaccinations. A Kenyan scientist, a Dr. Ngare, insisted on testing at least the initial shipment of the WHO vaccines before any immunisation took place, and discovered the vaccines contained estradiol, which is the major female sex hormone that regulates the estrous and menstrual female reproductive cycles. Its presence could render all females sterile and, when exposed to males as would be done with a polio vaccine, has been proven to damage the testes and prevent the creation of sperm. The WHO apparently had no explanation for the presence of this hormone in a polio vaccine, which would have acted to sterilise both men and women. (29)
You may be interested in this presentation on vaccines: (30) „Many of the organisations that promote vaccine administration around the world are linked with population control agendas says Dr. Sam Bailey, who in a short video highlights the history of anti-fertility vaccines. Over her career and after much research Dr. Sam Bailey, a New Zealand medical author and health educator, has discovered that the vaccine model and Germ Theory itself has many flaws. „Today, we’re going to cover an even shadier application of vaccines. That is the use of them to reduce fertility and even cause permanent sterilisation,“ Dr. Bailey said.
During her video she gave an overview of the philanthropical and health organisations that have been experimenting on humans with „secret ingredient vaccines“ beginning with The Rockefeller Foundation which in its 1968 annual report, page 72, stated: „Very little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found here.“ 1968 Rockefeller Foundation Annual Report.“
I don’t want to get into the COVID vaccines here because that is too large a topic. I will deal with this in a separate article, but a few comments on fertility are appropriate. The Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines likewise have caused concern about their effects on female fertility, with quite a long list of reports of menstrual and other reproductive disfunctions. The media quickly discounted all these as ‚temporary‘ and of no concern, but that was hardly comforting. The COVID vaccines seem to differ markedly in their content, with some batches causing blood clots while others are related to a wide variety of complaints, not all trivial. But Dr. Mike Yeadon, Professor Delores Cahill, Dr. Byram Bridle, Dr. Roger Hodkinson and many other competent scientists noted that the spike protein from the mRNA vaccines tended to collect in the ovaries and testes. They were unable to predict the precise effect of this, but expressed extreme concern for the effects the mRNA vaccines could have on fertility in both males and females.
And then we had the detailed article produced by the UK’s Daily Exposé which documented a major study demonstrating that fertility decreases with the rate of vaccination of women. (31) (32) In 2021, Professor Dr. Hervé Seligmann examined fertility in countries that have high rates of Covid injection uptake compared to those that have not. He concluded women’s fertility decreases the more women are vaccinated. Sir John Bell is a Canadian immunologist and geneticist. From 2006 to 2011, he was President of the UK’s Academy of Medical Sciences, and since 2002 he has held the Regius Chair of Medicine at the University of Oxford. In an interview in 2020 on the UK Channel 4, Dr. Bell said „These vaccines are unlikely to completely sterilise a population. They are very likely to have an effect which works in a percentage, say 60 or 70%.“
Dr. Seligmann’s study, „Female COVID19 vaccination associates with lower fertility (Hervé Seligmann, 28IX2021, version 7)“ (33) found that only Israel continued to enjoy relatively high fertility despite the high percentage of vaccinated women. He did not attempt to explain the reason for the Israeli anomaly but Haim Yativ, Director of the Nakim Organization (34), said the abnormality in Israel can be explained by the fact that Israel is „Pfizer’s laboratory state“, and that [Jewish women in Israel] must have been given a high percentage of placebo vaccinations to test the Covid injection results against them as a control group.
I have long held a suspicion that the mRNA vaccines have not been uniform throughout the world, that different countries have received vaccines with different content.
Certainly, Pfizer’s COVID vaccine has exhibited a very wide range of side effects according to the specific batch number, meaning that the batches were not at all the same. This is actually an enormous concern because the production in volumes of hundreds of millions or billions of doses of a vaccine is a very complex undertaking and, once up and running, is a closed system, meaning that every dose must ‚by definition‘ be identical to every other dose. To produce batches with varying properties means to shut down the system, introduce new contents, and restart.
It cannot occur in any other way, and this means that Pfizer’s COVID vaccine has been stage-managed by batch, with no information publicly available as to the actual contents of each batch. That’s not comforting.
This is so true that there is a website named „How Bad is My Batch“ dedicated to Pfizer’s vaccine that permits visitors to track the side effects which vary widely by batch. (35) Dr. Mike Yeadon stated flatly that „this is the calibration of a murder weapon“. Strong words, perhaps, but he knows better than I.
In researching this topic, it seems that in every case after a disturbing new report the mass media publish a quick whitewash and then we have a news blackout, a sudden total news embargo on the topic. Since fertility is a concern to almost everyone, these media blackouts cannot be random; they must be controlled from a central source. Given the simultaneity and the universality of the information embargo, there is no other way to account for it, and that means the usual group of suspects wants to avoid public speculation and information on this topic as it relates to GM seed and vaccines. And now we have the same with function-enhanced ZIKA and Oxitec’s „flying syringes“ that Bill Gates wants to distribute worldwide. Keep in mind that the entire media flood on the original ZIKA outbreak was directed totally to free abortions and the avoidance of pregnancy in Latin America.
The Usual Group of Suspects, and a Few New Ones
I think we can close with a brief examination of the participants in this vast enterprise to gain an appreciation of the tight interweaving of the parts and to understand that this is a tightly-held closed group.
These include the Rockefeller Institute, Bill Gates and his foundation, the WHO, the World Bank, USAID and UNICEF. We have the Rothschilds and their Sanofi hydra, Big Pharma and a list of private bio-tech companies, and secondary suppliers like Monsanto, DuPont and Syngenta. But the same group also includes a short list of private investment and financing companies, as well as the World Economic Forum and, Surprise! the US and UK bio-weapons labs, plus the CIA. They are all in this together and it is a far-ranging enterprise indeed, all directed from a central source and all following the same agenda.
Oxitec, originally Oxford Insect Technologies, was founded in 2002 by Luke Alphey, David Kelly and Paul Coleman. The three founders are no longer associated with Oxitec. Alphey is now at the Pirbright Institute, one of the UK’s two infamous biological weapons laboratories, where he works on „the emerging field of genetic pest management, focusing particularly on mosquitoes“. (36) You would have to be very naïve to believe that the UK’s Pirbright Institute is working on „pest management“. You may be interested to know that Professor Alphey was selected as a „Technology Pioneer“ by Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum in 2008, Oxitec also being heavily praised by that same group. Both Professor Alphey and Pirbright have a long history of weaponising insects and producing viral bio-weapons. Bulgarian researcher Dilyana Gaytandzhieva documented bird and insect infections in Ukraine, which would almost certainly have had participation from the UK at either Pirbright or Porton Down. (37)
It is more than interesting that this same group obtained in 2015 US patent number 8,967,029 B1 „Toxic Mosquito Aerial Release System,“ whose purpose is to „disperse infected mosquitos as a military weapon“. (38) As more than one researcher has noted, „The curious aspect of this patent is that the inventor, S. Mill Calvert, and the assignee, TMARS Associates, both of Manassas, Virginia, do not appear to exist . . .“ This was my experience as well, which means we are dealing with the alphabet agencies, most likely the CIA.
Inventor has 42 similar military patents including stroke-inducing
The inventor of the drone for the releasing of toxic mosquitoes S. Mill Calvert haspatented 42 similar military inventions for the US Army and Special forces, including stroke-inducing bullets and an instant eye-sealing weapon which can “instantly seal a person’s eyes when fired into a target’s face”, in a span of just two years from 2013 to 2015. A person with such a name however does not exist in the US citizens registry.
Investigative Journalist Dilyana Gaytandzhieva contacted the US patent Lawyer who filed the application (Louis Ventre) who declined to comment if this name was a pseudonym and who his client actually was (see copy of the emails on her website or on archive)
You may be interested to know that the Pirbright Institute was an unheralded attendee and participant at Event 201, the high-level pandemic exercise that described the outbreak of COVID-19 in China as it was actually developing in the dark. One of the reasons for Pirbright’s attendance is that this bio-weapons „Institute“ holds many of the patents on COVID-19.
Oxitec (our mosquito people) was named a World Economic Forum technology pioneer in 2008 and has been recognised by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation ‚Grand Challenges for Global Health Initiative‘. It was purchased by US-based Precigen and is now owned by Third Security, who also owns 40% of Precigen. Third Security is a kind of hedge fund with only 41 clients but more than $1 billion in assets under management, these assets being the same biotechnology companies as above. This company, and several like it, are funding agencies that gather money from the Gates and Rockefeller Foundations, the Rothschilds, whomever, and funnel it into whatever is on the current agenda.
Precigen is a US biotechnology company headquartered in Germantown, Maryland. It „applies engineering to biological systems to enable DNA-based control over the function and output of living cells“, and its focus is on „human gene therapy“ (such as Pfizer’s COVID vaccines). Monsanto, Syngenta, and the Gates Foundation are investors. Given the connection between these above groups and the bio-weapons labs like Pirbright, it isn’t a surprise that all of these „specialise in controlling insect damage to crops“. Or causing it, depending on the task for the day.
Epilogue
The transfer of ZIKA to the US and the subsequent gain of function research, then Oxitec’s new „trans-genic“ mosquito trials in the US, the sudden discovery of ZIKA in the US and a vaccine already in the making, cannot be a coincidence. Nor can the new media fear-mongering flood attempting to tie ZIKA to brain defects and thus the need to avoid pregnancy or at least obtain yet another vaccine.
The connections between Oxitec, the Pirbright Institute, the weaponised insects, Bill Gates‘ „flying syringes“, the CIA and the WHO, similarly cannot be random coincidences. The fact that all the members of this select group are devoted Malthusians with an altogether unwarranted enthusiasm for sterilising or otherwise depopulating the planet, is also not a source of comfort.
When I tie in Bill Gates‘ Flying Syringes with Oxitec, ZIKA, and COVID-19, I arrive at unpleasant conclusions, in large part because of the consistent media misinformation and lies accompanying these topics. Perhaps even worse, the interconnected web of individuals, companies and institutions involved in all these seemingly unrelated parts, are an entirely untrustworthy lot who are all provably entwined in worldwide depopulation efforts to be achieved by GM food and universal vaccinations. And, given the media silence about the ‚flying syringes‘, I have grave forebodings about Oxitec’s mosquitoes in the US and cannot put out of my mind a possible connection to COVID-19 vaccinations. The path seems too clear to me.
I cannot predict the final outcome of this puzzle but I have a bad feeling that, having progressed this far with the flying vaccinations, these people will not quit, and that means perpetual „vaccinations by insect“ that contain whatever our would-be masters desire. I think we are doomed.
Mr. Romanoff’s writinghas been translated into 32 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology‚When China Sneezes‚. (Chapt. 2 — Dealing with Demons).
Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors
Abstract
Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance. Many computer monitors and TV tubes, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be imbedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal. The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program. For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity.
Embed the Following Video - What Is the Ultimate World Economic Forum Agenda? - The Great Reset | G20 Panel Calls for Global Digital Health Passports | "Let's Have a Digital Health Certificate Acknowledged by WHO. If You Have Been Vaccinated or Tested Properly, Then You Can Move Around" - WATCH - https://rumble.com/v23vbm6-the-great-reset-g20-panel-calls-for-global-digital-health.html
Why Did the Now Convicted Harvard Professor Charles Lieber (Who Was Paid $50,000 Per Month Illegally by the Chinese Communist Party) Created Nano-technology That Allows Human Cells to Send and Receive Signals? READ - https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2011/01/virus-sized-transistors READ -
Harvard’s (now convicted) Charles M. Lieber Create a U.S. Patent for Using 5G Radiation to Vibrate Corona Virus Particles from Present Nanotube Containers? READ - https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2015199784A2/en
Why Did Harvard’s Charles Lieber Create Patents for Syringe-Injectable Mesh Electronics Integrate Seamlessly with Minimal Chronic Immune Response in the Brain? READ - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28533392/
Why Did China Choose to Pay the Renowned Nanotechnology Researcher & Harvard University Professor (Charles Lieber) $50,000 Per Month to Gain Access to His Patents for Using 5G Radiation to Vibrate Corona Virus Particles from Preset Nanotubule Containers? (Nanotechnology Can Be Weaponized to Deliver Viruses) - https://stateofthenation.co/?p=60567
A number of bodies with interests in radiation protection have highlighted the need to explore the effects of combined exposures to radiation and other agents. These include MELODI1 and UNSCEAR2.
‘I walked out and the world had transformed’: As CAMH remakes itself, patients feel the difference
As walls come down and new buildings go up, the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health is focusing on research and innovation, and changing how mental illness is viewed. Now, an anonymous $100-million donation will give the project a major boost.
In Switzerland, Hill’s work with the Blue Brain project — a collaboration between IBM and the École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne — created detailed models of brain circuitry.
A New Jersey native who earned his doctorate in Switzerland, Hill says the determination of CAMH president Dr. Catherine Zahn to make the centre a world leader in mental health research was a key reason he came to Toronto
Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors
Abstract
Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance. Many computer monitors and TV tubes, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be imbedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal. The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program. For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity.
Another in depth article, but I'll have to push back once again.
You need to revisit 9/11 as well as WWII - In other article comment sections, I've already shared some 9/11 info with you to look at, so I'll just reference on of my 9/11articles;
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
My awakening to the holocaust industry, after watching “Europa: The Last Battle”, which you can also find on Telegram, Odysee, not just on BitChute.
As with many people on this planet, we’re all searching for answers and truth and I take you’d all agree that we have been lied to about many, many things in the past and present.
We can all agree that cancel culture is a thing and that there is a disconnect when it comes to listening to opposing views on hot topics, like BLM, transgenderism, abortion, gun control and whatever. When it comes to Americans especially, I don’t know where their minds have gone as they cannot even define what a woman is, but they all clamber on the social justice warrior train regarding women’s rights and the feminist seem to have no issue with allowing a man in a dress to be called woman of the year and still they shy away from stating what a woman is.
I thought I’ve gone down most “conspiracy theory” rabbit holes and that I have an OK idea of how the world works and how the world got to where we find ourselves now. There was one subject that I never touched on and that was WWI and WWII. Like everyone, my views were based on what I was taught in school and then the myriad of movies Hollywood has churned out regarding WWII and the Holocaust in the 47 years I’ve been blessed to be on this earth.
But with most of us, with the onset of Covid, we all had extra time on our hands to spend our time differently and so I’ve done a lot of research on a lot of topics that I’ve never really had time to investigate. One day I came across a post on Telegram where people were talking about the “Holocaust industry” – I think it was an interview with Norman Finkelstein. A Jewish man who lost his parents during WWII and he made some stunning statements that rather angered me, and I then decided to investigate what he had to say.
So, I set out to find out more.
I learned of a young Jewish boy who visited Auschwitz in 1992, think his name is David Cole. He made note of the peculiar problems at Auschwitz and even had a conversation with the curator of the camp, and he told him that the gas chamber is a recreation and not THE actual gas chamber many jews met their fate. I also noted the chimney in the back of the gas chamber that is built on the ground and isn’t even attached to the gas chamber and that made me ask even more questions. After he made his 1992 documentary a hit was put out on him, and he then had to go into hiding.
I heard about a documentary called “Europa: The Last battle” – it’s a 10 part series, taking you on a FACTUAL journey from just before the start of the first world war right up until the end of the Nuremburg trials and I must tell you it was VERY difficult for me to watch, due to my whole worldview and understanding of the narrative around WWI & WWII was turned on its head.
Now, I must state, war for both sides see the most horrible things happen to people and I’m not trying to minimize the senseless loss of lives on both sides of the battlefield. All you need do is to go and ask your grandfathers / fathers / uncles who fought in the Vietnam war or Desert storm or any other major conflict after WWII what they saw happen to innocent people caught in the crossfire.
So, I learned a few things regarding the build up to WWI and WWII.
- I never knew 60 million Christian Russians were killed by Jewish Bolshevik Communists before WWII. (About 1917)
- Hitler tried to avert war for 7 years leading up to the start of WWII.
- I never knew the figure of “6 million” has been predictively programmed into the human consciousness since 1869 in the “newspaper of record”, the NY Times.
- I never knew that Britain was FIREBOMBING civilian towns in Germany for nearly 3 months before Hitler gave the order to go to war with Britain.
- I never knew that Auschwitz had a maternity ward, swimming pool, brothel, bar, and a hospital. I thought everyone climbing off the cattle cars were immediately gassed to death.
- I never knew that the death count at Auschwitz was lowered from 4 million to 1 million after the great holocaust trial in 1985 of Ernst Zundel and according to the Red Cross and other historians, the actual death count from all the concentration camps is just under 300 000 people (still a tragedy)
- I never did the calculation of how long it would take to cremate “6 million” people and that the figure is 64 years!
- I never knew that the initial reports in 1945 of 22 concentration camps that had “gas chambers” were reduced to only 6, as 16 had been revised by various historians and even Jewish historians and these 6 that were left, were in Poland and weren’t accessible to historians – why?
- I never knew that the German officers who signed affidavits at the Nuremberg trials, that there were gassings, had been tortured and kicked in the groin so badly that their tools would never work again and that the affidavits they signed were in English, which they could not read, write, or understand!
- I never knew close to 2 million German soldiers were starved to death in American POW camps after WWII ended.
- I can go on and on, but you need to at least watch “Europa: the last battle” if you can stomach the real events of WWI and WWII
It was a hard pill to swallow for me and I struggled to work through that documentary for over three months.
If you can put your prejudice aside and investigate the history you were taught as a kid, you will also awaken to find out that even more history has been tainted by the winners in order fool you.
Most of you should believe 911 was an “inside job” (boy do I have some interesting proof of what really happened), so why can’t you look at WWII with the same open mindedness or critical eyes?
I think I know why, because the industry protecting the lies around how and why WWII happened and what happened in the war is sanctioned by law, not to be questioned.
Why is it illegal to question the history we are being presented with?
I suggest everyone here to revisit what they think they know about WWI & WWII and the so-called holocaust, because WWII’s holocaust pales in comparison to the MANY holocausts that has followed in the last 80 years. Just research the death toll of the US military during operation desert storm or any of the US’s invasions all over the world, post WWII.
And before you call me a fascist or a Nazi, I’m just like you.
I am curious in knowing how our world has become so insanely disgusting in the last few years.
So, my recommended research references you can investigate is:
1. Ursula Haverbeck – 94-year-old woman jailed in Germany numerous times for “holocaust denial”.
2. The work of David Cole
3. The work of Fred Leuchter and his “The Leuchter report”
4. The work of David Irving
5. The work of Ernst Zündel
6. Europa – The Last battle
7. Any other “banned” book or author questioning the official narrative.
Once you have mustered up the courage to do what you are PROHIBITED to do, you’ll realise how you have been lied to and how this lie has been used to crush any criticism of Israel and jews.
The truth does not fear investigation. The holocaust does.
Another in depth article, but I'll have to push back once again.
You need to revisit 9/11 as well as WWII - In other article comment sections, I've already shared some 9/11 info with you to look at, so I'll just reference on of my 9/11articles;
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Then on WWII - I'd like to share the following...
My awakening to the holocaust industry, after watching “Europa: The Last Battle”, which you can also find on Telegram, Odysee, not just on BitChute.
As with many people on this planet, we’re all searching for answers and truth and I take you’d all agree that we have been lied to about many, many things in the past and present.
We can all agree that cancel culture is a thing and that there is a disconnect when it comes to listening to opposing views on hot topics, like BLM, transgenderism, abortion, gun control and whatever. When it comes to Americans especially, I don’t know where their minds have gone as they cannot even define what a woman is, but they all clamber on the social justice warrior train regarding women’s rights and the feminist seem to have no issue with allowing a man in a dress to be called woman of the year and still they shy away from stating what a woman is.
I thought I’ve gone down most “conspiracy theory” rabbit holes and that I have an OK idea of how the world works and how the world got to where we find ourselves now. There was one subject that I never touched on and that was WWI and WWII. Like everyone, my views were based on what I was taught in school and then the myriad of movies Hollywood has churned out regarding WWII and the Holocaust in the 47 years I’ve been blessed to be on this earth.
But with most of us, with the onset of Covid, we all had extra time on our hands to spend our time differently and so I’ve done a lot of research on a lot of topics that I’ve never really had time to investigate. One day I came across a post on Telegram where people were talking about the “Holocaust industry” – I think it was an interview with Norman Finkelstein. A Jewish man who lost his parents during WWII and he made some stunning statements that rather angered me, and I then decided to investigate what he had to say.
So, I set out to find out more.
I learned of a young Jewish boy who visited Auschwitz in 1992, think his name is David Cole. He made note of the peculiar problems at Auschwitz and even had a conversation with the curator of the camp, and he told him that the gas chamber is a recreation and not THE actual gas chamber many jews met their fate. I also noted the chimney in the back of the gas chamber that is built on the ground and isn’t even attached to the gas chamber and that made me ask even more questions. After he made his 1992 documentary a hit was put out on him, and he then had to go into hiding.
I heard about a documentary called “Europa: The Last battle” – it’s a 10 part series, taking you on a FACTUAL journey from just before the start of the first world war right up until the end of the Nuremburg trials and I must tell you it was VERY difficult for me to watch, due to my whole worldview and understanding of the narrative around WWI & WWII was turned on its head.
Now, I must state, war for both sides see the most horrible things happen to people and I’m not trying to minimize the senseless loss of lives on both sides of the battlefield. All you need do is to go and ask your grandfathers / fathers / uncles who fought in the Vietnam war or Desert storm or any other major conflict after WWII what they saw happen to innocent people caught in the crossfire.
So, I learned a few things regarding the build up to WWI and WWII.
- I never knew 60 million Christian Russians were killed by Jewish Bolshevik Communists before WWII. (About 1917)
- Hitler tried to avert war for 7 years leading up to the start of WWII.
- I never knew the figure of “6 million” has been predictively programmed into the human consciousness since 1869 in the “newspaper of record”, the NY Times.
- I never knew that Britain was FIREBOMBING civilian towns in Germany for nearly 3 months before Hitler gave the order to go to war with Britain.
- I never knew that Auschwitz had a maternity ward, swimming pool, brothel, bar, and a hospital. I thought everyone climbing off the cattle cars were immediately gassed to death.
- I never knew that the death count at Auschwitz was lowered from 4 million to 1 million after the great holocaust trial in 1985 of Ernst Zundel and according to the Red Cross and other historians, the actual death count from all the concentration camps is just under 300 000 people (still a tragedy)
- I never did the calculation of how long it would take to cremate “6 million” people and that the figure is 64 years!
- I never knew that the initial reports in 1945 of 22 concentration camps that had “gas chambers” were reduced to only 6, as 16 had been revised by various historians and even Jewish historians and these 6 that were left, were in Poland and weren’t accessible to historians – why?
- I never knew that the German officers who signed affidavits at the Nuremberg trials, that there were gassings, had been tortured and kicked in the groin so badly that their tools would never work again and that the affidavits they signed were in English, which they could not read, write, or understand!
- I never knew close to 2 million German soldiers were starved to death in American POW camps after WWII ended.
- I can go on and on, but you need to at least watch “Europa: the last battle” if you can stomach the real events of WWI and WWII
It was a hard pill to swallow for me and I struggled to work through that documentary for over three months.
If you can put your prejudice aside and investigate the history you were taught as a kid, you will also awaken to find out that even more history has been tainted by the winners in order fool you.
Most of you should believe 911 was an “inside job” (boy do I have some interesting proof of what really happened), so why can’t you look at WWII with the same open mindedness or critical eyes?
I think I know why, because the industry protecting the lies around how and why WWII happened and what happened in the war is sanctioned by law, not to be questioned.
Why is it illegal to question the history we are being presented with?
I suggest everyone here to revisit what they think they know about WWI & WWII and the so-called holocaust, because WWII’s holocaust pales in comparison to the MANY holocausts that has followed in the last 80 years. Just research the death toll of the US military during operation desert storm or any of the US’s invasions all over the world, post WWII.
And before you call me a fascist or a Nazi, I’m just like you.
I am curious in knowing how our world has become so insanely disgusting in the last few years.
So, my recommended research references you can investigate is:
1. Ursula Haverbeck – 94-year-old woman jailed in Germany numerous times for “holocaust denial”.
2. The work of David Cole
3. The work of Fred Leuchter and his “The Leuchter report”
4. The work of David Irving
5. The work of Ernst Zündel
6. Europa – The Last battle
7. Any other “banned” book or author questioning the official narrative.
Once you have mustered up the courage to do what you are PROHIBITED to do, you’ll realise how you have been lied to and how this lie has been used to crush any criticism of Israel and jews.
The truth does not fear investigation. The holocaust does.